The Institutional Consequences of Nudging – Nudges, Politics, and the Law

  title={The Institutional Consequences of Nudging – Nudges, Politics, and the Law},
  author={Robert Lepenies and Magdalena Małecka},
  journal={Review of Philosophy and Psychology},
In this article we argue that a widespread adoption of nudging can alter legal and political institutions. Debates on nudges thus far have largely revolved around a set of philosophical theories that we call individualistic approaches. Our analysis concerns the ways in which adherents of nudging make use of the newest findings in the behavioral sciences for the purposes of policy-making. We emphasize the fact that most nudges proposed so far are not a part of the legal system and are also non… 

Behaviour change: extralegal, apolitical, scientistic?

Nudges pose challenges for democracy and the law and they presume a simplified view of science. These very broad charges will be sustained through a series of sketched arguments that criticize the

Framing Choices to Influence Behaviors : a Debate on the Pros and Cons of “Nudging”

In recent years, a viable alternative to the traditional “legislate-and-sanction” approach has been sustained: an approach of libertarian-paternalism through behavior incentives/disincentives defined

Exploring the (behavioural) political economy of nudging

Abstract In recent years, a novel, specifically institutional approach to public regulation has become popular, particularly in the Anglo-Saxon world: ‘Libertarian Paternalism’ promises to tackle

De-biasing democracy. Behavioural public policy and the post-democratic turn

ABSTRACT This article focuses on the political implications of behavioural public policy for democratic governance and participation. It is being argued that it is an influential case illuminating

Nudging and Participation: a Contractualist Approach to Behavioural Policy

As behavioural economics reveals, human decision-making deviates from neoclassical assumptions about human behaviour and people (often) fail to make the ‘right’ welfare-enhancing choice. The purpose

Behavioural sciences in law and policy : a case of scientific imperialism?

The paper discusses applications of the behavioural sciences to law and aims at contributing to the contemporary discussions on scientific imperialism. By analysing these applications we demonstrate

Nudges and nodality tools: New developments in old instruments

The (centralised) collection and dissemination of information is a common feature of policy-making, and many policy tools directly originate and benefit from governments’ nodal position. It allows

From Libertarian Paternalism to Nudging—and Beyond

How can the government influence people to make better decisions about health, wealth and happiness without coercing them? This question has motivated legal scholar Cass Sunstein and economist

Three challenges for behavioural science and policy: the empirical, the normative and the political

Abstract In a ‘post-truth’ era in which personality and opinion trump evidence and reason, the need for frankness in debates about the use and boundaries of science and policy is high. We welcome the

The Enzymatic Effect of Behavioural Sciences – What About Policy-Maker's Expectations?

  • Kathrin Loer
  • Political Science
    Handbook of Behavioural Change and Public Policy
  • 2019
As traditional policy instruments seem to be reaching their limits with regard to effectiveness, it is no wonder that the question arises whether behaviourally-inspired strategies might be an elegant



Nudge and the Manipulation of Choice

In Nudge (2008) Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein suggested that public policy–makers arrange decision–making contexts in ways to promote behaviour change in the interest of individual citizens as

The Ethics of Nudge

In their recently published book Nudge (2008) Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein (T&S) defend a position labelled as ‘libertarian paternalism’. Their thinking appeals to both the right and the

Nudging legally: On the checks and balances of behavioral regulation

As behavioural sciences are unearthing the complex cognitive framework in which people make decisions, policymakers seem increasingly ready to design behaviourally-informed regulations to induce

Why Nudge?: The Politics of Libertarian Paternalism

The bestselling author of Simpler offers a powerful, provocative, and convincing argument for protecting people from their own mistakes Based on a series of pathbreaking lectures given at Yale

Old wine in new casks: libertarian paternalism still violates liberal principles

It is shown that Libertarian Paternalism violates core liberal principles, first because it limits freedom, and secondly because it fails to justify these limitations in ways acceptable to liberal positions.

Libertarian Paternalism is Not an Oxymoron

The idea of libertarian paternalism might seem to be an oxymoron, but it is both possible and legitimate for private and public institutions to affect behavior while also respecting freedom of

Social Control Through Law

Social Control Through Law is remarkable in manner and style. Roscoe Pound shows himself to be a jurist, philosopher, and scientist. For Pound, the subject matter of law involves examining

Libertarian paternalism is an oxymoron: an essay in defence of liberty

Sunstein and Thaler’s proposal for ‘libertarian paternalism’ in their paper titled “Libertarian Paternalism is not an Oxymoron” (LPNO from here on) is based on the contention that paternalism is

Law as a means to an end : threat to the rule of law

Introduction Part I. The Spread of Legal Instrumentalism: 1. Non-instrumental views of law 2. Changing society and common law in the nineteenth century 3. Nineteenth century legislation and legal

Debiasing through Law

In many settings, human beings are boundedly rational. A distinctive and insufficiently explored legal response to bounded rationality is to attempt to debias through law by steering people in more