The Insanity Defense before 1800

@article{Walker1985TheID,
  title={The Insanity Defense before 1800},
  author={Nigel Walker},
  journal={The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science},
  year={1985},
  volume={477},
  pages={25 - 30}
}
  • N. Walker
  • Published 1 January 1985
  • History, Law
  • The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
The earliest context in which madness is treated as an excuse for crime is Justinian's Digest. The Christian church brought this feature of Roman law to pre-Norman England. Madmen were probably not regarded as triable by ordeal, but were simply left to be guarded by their kinsfolk. When trial by ordeal was abandoned, and juries had to determine guilt, juries were at first expected to find madmen guilty but refer their cases to the king for pardon. It was not until about 1500 that juries seem to… 
The Modern Foundation for the Insanity Defense: The Cases of James Hadfield (1800) and Daniel McNaughtan (1843)
The modern foundation for the insanity defense was put in place during the first half of the nineteenth century, between the years 1800 and 1843. During this brief period the reaction to the
Searching for the Self in Eighteenth-Century English Criminal Trials, 1730-1800
At Samuel Prigg’s trial for murder at London’s Old Bailey in May 1746, a witness for the defense testified that Prigg “sometimes . . . has talked wildly, and I have taken him to task as he has been
‘Of the Persons Capable of Committing Crimes’: Pleas of Mental Distress in the Eighteenth-Century Courtroom
When Lawrence Shirley, Earl Ferrers (1720–1760), stood accused of the brutal murder of his steward, John Johnson, on April 16, 1760, he pleaded his innocence by reason of insanity. At his state trial
Law & psychiatry: Does the constitution require an insanity defense?
TLDR
John Delling, on trial for two murders in Idaho, was unable to plead insanity or to argue that he lacked intent to kill, the only available option under Idaho law, so the state's supreme court rejected his appeal.
Drunkenness and Responsibility for Crime in the Eighteenth Century
E representations of the relationship between alcohol and crime shifted between the late seventeenth century and the middle of the eighteenth century. Drunkenness, described by Richard Younge in 1664
The Breivik case and the comparative issues of criminal (in)sanity
In the summer of 2011, Anders Behring Breivik committed a terrorist attack in Norway in which 77 people were killed, and at least 319 more were injured. This paper analyses several aspects of the
The Spirit of Madness: Uncertainty, Diagnosis, and the Restoration of Sanity in the Miracles of Henry VI
Five miracles in the collection of Henry VI of England (d. 1471) describe the restoration of a person who had lost his or her reason. This article explores and contextualizes the rhetoric with which
Madness as method: on Locke’s thought experiments about personal identity
ABSTRACT John Locke is famous for popularizing the method of the philosophical thought experiment in discussions of personal identity; the cases introduced in the second edition of An Essay
Medical diagnosis of legal culpability: the impact of early psychiatric testimony in the 19th century English criminal trial.
  • Ciara Toole
  • Law
    International journal of law and psychiatry
  • 2012
Ancient Origins – or Otherwise – of the Insanity Defence
Contemporary authors often ascribe an ancient pedigree to the insanity defence. Several of these assert that its origins lay in ancient Greece. This article explores the nature and exercise of Greek
...
1
2
3
4
...

References

To Be Noted