The Influence of Attention Set, Working Memory Capacity, and Expectations on Inattentional Blindness

@article{Kreitz2016TheIO,
  title={The Influence of Attention Set, Working Memory Capacity, and Expectations on Inattentional Blindness},
  author={Carina Kreitz and Philip Furley and Daniel Memmert and Daniel J. Simons},
  journal={Perception},
  year={2016},
  volume={45},
  pages={386 - 399}
}
The probability of inattentional blindness, the failure to notice an unexpected object when attention is engaged on some primary task, is influenced by contextual factors like task demands, features of the unexpected object, and the observer’s attention set. However, predicting who will notice an unexpected object and who will remain inattentionally blind has proven difficult, and the evidence that individual differences in cognition affect noticing remains ambiguous. We hypothesized that… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

The relationship between sustained inattentional blindness and working memory capacity

It appears that any relationship between inattentional blindness and working memory is either too small to have practical significance or is moderated by other factors and consequently varies with attributes such as the sample characteristics within a given study.

The role of perceptual and cognitive load on inattentional blindness: A systematic review and three meta-analyses

Investigating whether a classic theoretical model of attention, namely the Load Theory, could account for a large range of empirical findings in this field by distinguishing the role of perceptual and cognitive resources in attentional selection and attentional capture by irrelevant stimuli reveals that inattentional blindness significantly increases with the perceptual load of the task.

Loads of unconscious processing: The role of perceptual load in processing unattended stimuli during inattentional blindness

The results suggest that high perceptual load cannot prevent task-irrelevant stimuli that remain undetected from being processed to an extent that enables them to affect performance in a primary task.

Guessing right: Preconscious processing in inattentional blindness

The present study substantiated and generalised limited evidence by reanalysing 16 datasets in regard to participants’ guessing accuracy in multiple-choice questions concerning the unexpected object: Participants who did not notice the critical object showed guessing accuracy that lay significantly above chance.

Regular schematic start training in the process of drivers’ selective attention

training were inter-subject variables, and the event type was an intra-subject variable. The dependent variable was the driver's correct rate of identifying two kinds of events and the total visit

Does hunger promote the detection of foods? The effect of value on inattentional blindness

Although human perception has evolved into a potent and efficient system, we still fall prey to astonishing failures of awareness as we miss an unexpected object in our direct view when our attention

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 58 REFERENCES

Working memory and inattentional blindness

In two studies with large samples, the relationship between multiple working memory measures and inattentional blindness was tested and individual differences in working memory predicted the ability to perform an attention-demanding tracking task, but did not predict the likelihood of noticing an unexpected object present during the task.

Inattentional Blindness and Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities

The results are largely consistent with the notion that noticing unexpected objects is driven more by stochastic processes common to all people than by stable individual differences in cognitive abilities.

Executive working memory load induces inattentional blindness

The engagement of executive processes impairs the ability to detect unexpected, task-irrelevant stimuli, suggesting that inattentional blindness can result from central, amodal stages of processing.

Attention set for number: expectation and perceptual load in inattentional blindness.

These experiments provide compelling evidence that expectations do affect detection of an unexpected stimulus, and are the first to demonstrate that individuals set their attention for the number of items to be detected and are vulnerable to inattentional blindness whenever their primary-task numerical expectation is fulfilled.

Working memory capacity accounts for the ability to switch between object-based and location-based allocation of visual attention

This study tested whether utilizing object-based visual attention is a resource-limited process that is difficult for low-span individuals, and tested the uses of object versus location-based attention with high and low- span subjects.

The attentional cost of inattentional blindness

How not to be Seen: The Contribution of Similarity and Selective Ignoring to Sustained Inattentional Blindness

A new approach to the study of sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events is presented in order to explore the roles of similarity, distinctiveness, and attentional set in the detection of unexpected objects.

The effects of individual differences and task difficulty on inattentional blindness

It is suggested that although the demands of the primary task do affect inattentional blindness rates, individual differences in the ability to meet those demands do not.

What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness.

The authors conclude that many--but not all--aspects of attention capture apply to inattentional blindness but that these 2 classes of phenomena remain importantly distinct.
...