• Corpus ID: 27877176

The Impact of Panel Composition on Sex Discrimination Case Outcomes at the U.S. Circuit Courts

  title={The Impact of Panel Composition on Sex Discrimination Case Outcomes at the U.S. Circuit Courts},
  author={Ren{\'e}e Nicole Souris},
This paper explores panel dynamics for sex discrimination cases at the U.S. Circuit Courts. It offers an interdisciplinary approach to studying panel judicial decision-making on the U.S. Circuit Courts by drawing on mainstream legal theory, contemporary political science, and the empirical legal sciences. After situating the issue within a multi-faceted theoretical framework provided by these three disciplines, hypotheses concerning the impact of the presence of female and minority judges on… 

Tables from this paper


Institutional Dynamics on the U.S. Court of Appeals: Minority Representation Under Panel Decision Making
This article assesses how the institutional context of decision making on three-judge panels of the federal Court of Appeals affects the impact that gender and race have on judicial decisions. Our
Gendered Justice: Do Male and Female Judges Rule Differently on Questions of Gay Rights?
After reviewing 424 legal conclusions by 244 judges, this piece concludes that there are statistically significant differences between how men and women rule on questions of gay rights, with women
The Diversification of the Federal Bench: Policy and Process Ramifications
Considerable debate has been generated regarding the impact of President Carter's appointment of record numbers of female and minority judges to the lower federal courts. Using a "matched pair"
Politics and the Judiciary: The Influence of Judicial Background on Case Outcomes
It is widely believed that the background and worldview of judges influence their decisions. This article uses the fact that judges are assigned their cases randomly to assess the effect of judicial
Court Decision Making in Police Brutality Cases, 1990-2000
Prior research on state supreme courts tends to concentrate on evaluating the influence of gender or elections on the behavior of justices but not both. By studying either gender or elections, the
Here Comes the Judge: The Influence of Judge Personal Characteristics on Federal Sexual Harassment Case Outcomes
Results revealed that younger judges and Democrat judges were more likely to find for the plaintiff (the alleged victim of harassment), and judges' personal characteristics influenced case outcomes.
Judicial Hostility Toward Labor Unions? Applying the Social Background Model to a Celebrated Concern
Brudney, Schiavoni, and Merritt address an important debate dividing lawyers and political scientists: To what extent do extradoctrinal factors such as political party, gender, and professional
Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging
We enter the debate over the role of sex in judging by addressing the two predominant empirical questions it raises: whether male and female judges decide cases distinctly (individual effects) and
Impact of Ethnicity, Gender, and Previous Experience on Juror Judgments in Sexual Harassment Cases1
To examine the influence of gender, having been the target of sexual harassment, and ethnicity on jury decisions, 215 respondents reviewed 17 sexual harassment cases ranging on a continuum from
Women as Policymakers: The Case of Trial Judges
Previous research analyzing differences between men and women political elites has focused primarily on attitudinal differences, recruitment patterns, or background characteristics. In contrast, this