• Corpus ID: 17473580

The Impact of Accountability on Cognitive Bias

  title={The Impact of Accountability on Cognitive Bias},
  author={Jennifer Susan Lerner},
Research on accountability takes an unusual approach to the study of judgment and decision making. By situating decision makers within particular accountability conditions, it has begun to bridge individual, interpersonal, and institutional levels of analysis. We propose that this multi-level approach can enhance both the study of judgment and choice and the application of such research to real-world settings. To illustrate the multi-level approach, we present a review of accountability… 
Rationalizing Conflict
How does accountability impact political decisions? Though previous research on accountability has demonstrated its potential effects in the realms of business, elections, and more, very little
Abstract Our response to this symposium on our 2006 paper centers on three questions. First, what motivations exist in the political wild, and do our experimental manipulations realistically capture
Lawyers' Perceptions of the U.S. Supreme Court: Is the Court a “Political” Institution?
Do legal elites-lawyers admitted to federal appellate bars-perceive the Supreme Court as a "political" institution? Legal elites differentiate themselves from the mass public in the amount and
PairWise : Mitigating Political Bias in Crowdsourced Content Moderation
Crowdsourced labeling of political social media content is an area of increasing interest, due to the contextual nature of political content. However, there are substantial risks of human biases
The Cycle of Excellence: Using Deliberate Practice to Improve Supervision and Training
This edited volume brings together leading supervisors and researchers to explore a model for supervision based on behavioral rehearsal with continuous corrective feedback, demonstrating how this model complements and enhances a traditional, theory-based approach.
Prioritizing questions and methods for an international and interdisciplinary supervision research agenda: Suggestions by eight scholars
Eight active supervision scholars provide their perspectives on priorities for advancing research in clinical supervision. Based on proposals they presented at an invited symposium held during the


Accounting for the effects of accountability.
This article reviews the now extensive research literature addressing the impact of accountability on a wide range of social judgments and choices and highlights the utility of treating thought as a process of internalized dialogue and the importance of documenting social and institutional boundary conditions on putative cognitive biases.
Effects of procedural and outcome accountability on judgment quality
Abstract Individuals are said to be accountable whenever their performance is monitored and there are consequences (either tangible or intangible) associated with that evaluation. We propose that
Accountability amplifies the status quo effect when change creates victims
This study assesses the impact of accountability, the status quo, and anticipated costs and benefits on judgement of the acceptability of a drug in the US pharmaceuticals market. Several effects are
Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: conformity, complexity, and bolstering.
This experiment tested predictions derived from a social contingency model of judgment and choice that identifies 3 distinctive strategies that people rely on in dealing with demands for
The Effects of Task Characteristics on Covariation Assessment: The Impact of Accountability and Judgment Frame
Abstract The impact of personal accountability and judgment frame on strategies for assessing covariation between two binary variables was examined in two experiments. Using a task designed to
Accountability and judgment processes in a personality prediction task.
Preexposure-accountability subjects reported more integratively complex impressions of test-takers, made more accurate behavioral predictions, and reported more appropriate levels of confidence in their predictions than did either no-Accountability or postexposure- accountability subjects.
Accountability: a social magnifier of the dilution effect.
The accountability manipulation motivated subjects to use a wide range of information in making judgments, but did not make them more discriminating judges of the usefulness of that information.
Cognitive accommodation, language, and social responsibility.
The two studies reported here examine cognitive accommodation in a betting situation where a decision-maker perceives that the person for whom he is making judgments has a legitimate right to have an