The Great Psychotherapy Debate

  title={The Great Psychotherapy Debate},
  author={Bruce E. Wampold and Zac E. Imel},
• A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features… 

Psychotherapy Relationships That Work III

The authors conclude that decades of research evidence and clinical experience converge: the psychotherapy relationship makes substantial and consistent contributions to outcome independent of the type of treatment.

The Scope of Psychotherapy Integration: Introduction to a Special Issue

This special issue of the journal is intended to introduce readers to developments in the field of psychotherapy integration and to the Society for the Exploration of Psychotherapy Integration

Scientific Research into Psychotherapy

This chapter presents an overview of psychotherapy research. It starts by setting out a set of principles supported by scientific evidence and clinical experience. These principles work as synthesis

Informed Consent, the Placebo Effect and Psychodynamic Psychotherapy

The study of paternalism arguably becomes most penetrating when the discussion moves to authentic case cases, and patient autonomy and choice are now (in codified form, at least) principles to which physicians must legally adhere.

Science and Psychotherapy

Being a psychotherapist involves the development of a reflexive capacity to draw on diverse sources of knowledge, including personal, practical, and research-based ways of knowing. The professional

Cochrane’s risk of bias tool in the context of psychotherapy outcome research

  • T. MunderJ. Barth
  • Psychology
    Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research
  • 2018
The rationale of a widely used tool to assess the methodological quality of primary studies for meta-analysis is discussed and suggestions for its use in the context of psychotherapy outcome research are provided.

The research tradition in person-centered/experiential psychotherapy and counseling: bibliographical survey 1940–2015

ABSTRACT The bibliography presents an overview of empirical research publications 1940–2015 within the person-centered-experiential-humanistic (PCE) paradigm. The survey consists of three parts: Part

The experience of continuing professional development and its impact on clinical practice

Research indicates that therapists are dedicated to self-development but the nature of their development is emergent rather than planned; and life experiences, learning from clients and acceptance in the professional community are valued above more traditional concepts of CPD.

Case formulation of interpersonal patterns and its impact on the therapeutic process: Introduction to the issue.

Authors included in this issue of the Journal of Clinical Psychology: In-Session come from diverse theoretical orientations but discuss methods of case conceptualization that share these assumptions:



The Great Psychotherapy Debate: Models, Methods, and Findings

Contents: Foreword. Preface. Competing Meta-Models: The Medical Model Versus the Contextual Model. Differential Hypotheses and Evidentiary Rules. Absolute Efficacy: The Benefits of Psychotherapy

Essential Research Findings in Counseling and Psychotherapy

I recently had the opportunity to read Cooper’s book, Essential Research Findings in Counseling and Psychotherapy. The book is written for those professionals who work in thefield of counseling and

Limitations of the Dodo Bird Verdict and the Role of Clinical Trials in Psychotherapy Research: Comment on Wampold et al. (1997)

B. E. Wampold et al.'s (1997) meta-analysis provides a useful and methodologically sophisticated summary of the results of comparative psychotherapy outcome research. Despite its strengths, some

Empirically supported psychological interventions: controversies and evidence.

The work of several task forces and other groups reviewing empirically supported treatments (ESTs) in the United States, United Kingdom, and elsewhere is summarized here, along with the lists of treatments that have been identified as ESTs.

Relation between Working Alliance and Outcome in Psychotherapy: A Meta-Analysis.

Results of 24 studies (based on 20 distinct data sets) relating the quality of the working alliance (WA) to therapy outcome were synthesized using meta-analytic procedures. A moderate but reliable

Alliance in individual psychotherapy.

A research synthesis of the relation between alliance and the outcomes of individual psychotherapy covered over 200 research reports based on 190 independent data sources, covering more than 14,000 treatments.

Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: a meta-analytic review.

The results of the meta-analysis indicate that the overall relation of therapeutic alliance with outcome is moderate, but consistent, regardless of many of the variables that have been posited to influence this relationship.

Human Change Processes: The Scientific Foundations of Psychotherapy

Conceptual Introduction and Historical Contexts * Human Change: The Ultimate Ethical Frontier * A Brief History of Ideas * The Foundations and the Future of Scientific Psychology Scientific Studies

Differences in client and therapist views of the working alliance in drug treatment

The low consensus between client and counsellor views of the alliance found in this and other studies highlights the need for drug counsellors to attend closely to their clients' perceptions of their alliance and to seek regular feedback from clients regarding their feelings about their therapeutic relationship.

Do patients and their therapists agree on the content of treatments?

  • K. Bøgwald
  • Psychology, Medicine
    The Journal of nervous and mental disease
  • 2001
Agreement between therapist and patient regarding their perception of therapist's interventions and qualities was studied and cross invariance (patient and therapist perspective) was found by use of confirmatory factor analysis.