The Gatekeepers of Modern Physics: Periodicals and Peer Review in 1920s Britain
@article{Clarke2015TheGO, title={The Gatekeepers of Modern Physics: Periodicals and Peer Review in 1920s Britain}, author={Imogen Clarke}, journal={Isis}, year={2015}, volume={106}, pages={70 - 93} }
This essay analyzes the processes behind the publication of physics papers in two British journals in the 1920s: the Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series A and the Philosophical Magazine. On the surface, it looked as though the Philosophical Magazine was managed very informally, while the Proceedings had in place a seemingly rigid system of committee approval and peer review. This essay shows, however, that in practice the two journals were both influenced by networks of expertise… Expand
Topics from this paper
9 Citations
THE ROYAL SOCIETY AND THE PREHISTORY OF PEER REVIEW, 1665–1965
- Political Science
- The Historical Journal
- 2017
- 40
- PDF
Beams of Particles and Papers. The Role of Preprint Archives in High Energy Physics
- Engineering, Computer Science
- ArXiv
- 2016
- 1
- PDF
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 12 REFERENCES
The Maxwellians
- 1991
The Thought of Late Victorian Physicists: Oliver Lodge's Ethereal Body
- Sir James Jeans: A Biography
- 1952
In the end, neither Hicks's nor Lees's papers was published
- Obituary Notices Fellows Roy. Soc
- 1935
Fleetway, 1924); and Jeans
- The Quantum Theory and New Theories of Atomic Structure
- 1919
Jeans has retrospectively been labeled a "classical physicist," but, as Staley has pointed out, he is unlikely to have been viewed as such by his contemporaries. See Staley
- On the Lucasian Professorship and its holders see Kevin C. Knox and Richard Noakes, From Newton to Hawking: A History of Cambridge University's Lucasian Professors of Mathematics
- 1900
Hargreaves noted in a letter to Larmor that he usually sent his mathematical physics to these two destinations: Richard Hargreaves to Larmor
- Joseph Larmor Papers