• DOI:10.1046/J.1523-1739.1999.97428.X
• Corpus ID: 55622346

The Gaps between Theory and Practice in Selecting Nature Reserves

@article{Prendergast1999TheGB,
  title={The Gaps between Theory and Practice in Selecting Nature Reserves},
  author={John R. Prendergast and Rachel M. Quinn and John H. Lawton},
  journal={Conservation Biology},
  year={1999},
  volume={13},
  pages={484-492}
}

• J. Prendergast, R. M. Quinn, J. Lawton
• Published 1 June 1999
• Business
• Conservation Biology

Over the last three decades a great deal of research, money, and effort have been put into the devel- opment of theory and techniques designed to make conservation more efficient. Much of the recent emphasis has been on methods to identify areas of high conservation interest and to design efficient networks of na- ture reserves. Reserve selection algorithms, gap analysis, and other computerized approaches have much po- tential to transform conservation planning, yet these methods are used only infrequently by those charged with managing landscapes. We briefly describe different approaches to identifying potentially valuable areas and methods for reserve selection and then discuss the reasons they remain largely unused by conservation- ists and land-use planners. Our informal discussions with ecologists, conservationists, and land managers from Europe and the United States suggested that the main reason for the low level of adoption of these so- phisticated tools is simply that land managers have been unaware of them. Where this has not been the case, low levels of funding, lack of understanding about the purpose of these tools, and general antipathy toward what is seen as a prescriptive approach to conservation all play a part. We recognize there is no simple solu- tion but call for a closer dialogue between theoreticians and practitioners in conservation biology. The two communities might be brought into closer contact in numerous ways, including carefully targeted publica- tion of research and Internet communication. However it is done, we feel that the needs of land managers need to be catered to by those engaged in conservation research and that managers need to be more aware of what science can contribute to practical conservation.