The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique

@article{Grnbaum1987TheFO,
  title={The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique},
  author={Adolf Gr{\"u}nbaum},
  journal={Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association},
  year={1987},
  volume={36},
  pages={521 - 528}
}
  • A. Grünbaum
  • Published 1 March 1987
  • Psychology, Philosophy
  • Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association
This study is a philosophical critique of the foundations of Sigmund Freud's psychoanalysis. As such, it also takes cognizance of his claim that psychoanalysis has the credentials of a natural science. It shows that the reasoning on which Freud rested the major hypotheses of his edifice was fundamentally flawed, even if the probity of the clinical observations he adduced were not in question. Moreover, far from deserving to be taken at face value, clinical data from the psychoanalytic treatment… 
Précis of The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique
Abstract This book critically examines Freud's own detailed arguments for his major explanatory and therapeutic principles, the current neorevisionist versions of psychoanalysis, and the
How do psychoanalysts know what they know
This paper puts forward an account of psychoanalysis as an organised practice for the generation of new knowledge. Against criticisms of psychoanalysis as a pseudo-science or failed science it
A relational model of inquiry and truth: The place of psychoanalysis in human conversation
A challenge is offered to the characterization of psychoanalysis as suffering from potentially fatal epistemic flaws and needing to ground itself in the language of hermeneutics, neuropsychology, or
Commentary: psychodynamics and social cognition--notes on the fusion of psychoanalysis and psychology.
Interest in linking psychoanalysis with scientific psychology waxes and wanes. In part, the difficulties have been caused by the preference of psychoanalysts for Freud's clinical theory (and its
Freud: The Psychology of Psychoanalysis
Both the meaning and the significance of Freud’s epochal work remain at the focus of heated disputes within the psychoanalytic and the intellectual communities in general. This is perhaps due to the
Psychoanalysis, Science and Clinical Practice
  • R. King
  • Psychology
    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry
  • 1992
TLDR
It is argued instead that psychoanalysis, science and clinical practice are epistemologically independent fields and attempts to subsume one within the other are unproductive.
Pitfalls of a One-Sided Image of Science: Adolf Grünbaum's Foundations of Psychoanalysis
  • E. R. Wallace
  • Psychology
    Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association
  • 1989
TLDR
Whileolf Grünbaum's volume is an important contribution to the epistemological assessment of psychoanalysis, it reflects serious shortcomings in at least four areas: its treatment of the role of suggestion in the analytic enterprise, its scrutiny of the psychoanalytic genetic method, its appreciation of analytic methodology as actually practiced, and its predication on a unidimensional, positivistic vision of science.
Grünbaum's Freud
Grunbaum characterizes the foundations of psychoanalysis as consisting primarily of two assertions ‐ (1) only psychoanalysis can give correct insight into the unconscious causes of neurosis, and (2)
The Science of Psychoanalysis
Abstract:Can psychoanalytic theory be scientific? Psychoanalysis has a distinct method that has generated a distinct body of evidence, the clinical data. To qualify as a scientific psychology, these
On The Scientific Standing of Psychoanalysis
  • B. Opatow
  • Psychology, Philosophy
    Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association
  • 1999
This paper speaks for the claim that psychoanalysis qualifies as a scientific enterprise. It will derive from the conceptual and evidential structure of psychoanalysis a causal empirical hypothesis