The Fake, the Flimsy, and the Fallacious: Demarcating Arguments in Real Life

@article{Boudry2015TheFT,
  title={The Fake, the Flimsy, and the Fallacious: Demarcating Arguments in Real Life},
  author={M. Boudry and F. Paglieri and M. Pigliucci},
  journal={Argumentation},
  year={2015},
  volume={29},
  pages={431-456}
}
Philosophers of science have given up on the quest for a silver bullet to put an end to all pseudoscience, as such a neat formal criterion to separate good science from its contenders has proven elusive. In the literature on critical thinking and in some philosophical quarters, however, this search for silver bullets lives on in the taxonomies of fallacies. The attractive idea is to have a handy list of abstract definitions or argumentation schemes, on the basis of which one can identify bad or… Expand
26 Citations

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 98 REFERENCES
The blaze of her splendors: Suggestions about revitalizing fallacy theory
  • 40
  • Highly Influential
Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem
  • 103
Argumentation and fallacies in creationist writings against evolutionary theory
  • 10
Evolutionary Debunking Arguments
  • 174
  • PDF
False Dilemma: A Systematic Exposition
  • 11
The death of argument - fallacies in agent based reasoning
  • J. Woods
  • Computer Science, Mathematics
  • Applied logic series
  • 2004
  • 73
The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies.
  • 224
  • PDF
...
1
2
3
4
5
...