The Failure of the Israeli–Palestinian Peace Process, 1993–2000

  title={The Failure of the Israeli–Palestinian Peace Process, 1993–2000},
  author={Oren Barak},
  journal={Journal of Peace Research},
  pages={719 - 736}
  • Oren Barak
  • Published 1 November 2005
  • Political Science
  • Journal of Peace Research
The article presents a critique of the Israeli–Palestinian peace process of 1993–2000 (the Oslo Process) by placing it in historical and theoretical perspective. It begins by showing how the Oslo Process was inspired by the legacy of peacemaking in the Arab–Israeli conflict, which stipulated peacemaking between states, and contends that this factor had far-reaching implications for the way the Israeli–Palestinian conflict was analyzed and treated. It then employs insights from the expanding… 

Tables from this paper

Two States or Not Two States? Leadership and Peace Making in the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict
The debate around the viability of the so-called ‘Two-State Solution’ and the perspective of an alternative ‘One-State Solution’ began to attract renewed the attention after the collapse of the Oslo
Challenging Liberal Peacebuilding, as Part of Liberal Internationalism
This chapter provides the conceptual framework employed in the critique of liberal peacebuilding and, more broadly, liberal internationalism presented in this book. The core of the critique focuses
The PLO at Fifty: A Historical Perspective
  • A. Sela
  • Political Science, Sociology
  • 2014
The article offers an overview of the political history of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) from its birth to the present. It analyzes the social and political origins of the PLO, the
Since the beginning of the 20 th century, the Israeli-Palestinian unsettled issue began to escalate into a conflict. The small piece of land couth the eye of political interests and became a very big
The Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflicts: The Israeli-Palestinian Case
Asymmetry is considered one of the most relevant features in today’s conflicts. In this article we address one particular type of asymmetry — structural asymmetry. After introducing the main
Understanding the Success and Failures of Oslo: A conflict management approach to the Israeli-Palestine rivalry
  • Political Science
  • 2015
Violent conflicts are unfortunately a common occurrence throughout human history, as well as a feature of contemporary international relations. The global spread of such conflicts means that they
Israeli Peace Discourse: A cultural approach to CDA
What role do language and discourse play in the advancement of peace? What is the connection between a given society’s “peace language” and the repeated failure of peace initiatives involving it? At
Many scholars and politicians have been advocating the end of the two-state solution, given major obstacles like the right of return for the refugees, the settlements, the weakness of the Palestinian
A time of peace
This article considers the conflicting temporal models of peace among Jewish Israelis, specifically between liberal Zionists who populate the traditional peace camp, and the broader population that
Recipe for Failure: The Impotence of the Oslo Accords
Introduction The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is one of the longest running, active, violent conflicts within our global community. Historically, it has been marred with diverse and entrenched facets


What Went Wrong? The Collapse of the Israeli‐Palestinian Peace Process
With the election of Ariel Sharon and the Palestinian turn from revolution to terrorism, the Israeli-Palestinian "peace process," which managed to go on for over ten years without producing peace,
The Relevance of Reconciliation Actions in the Breakdown of Israeli–Palestinian Negotiations, 2000†
The breakdown of Israeli–Palestinian negotiations toward a final status agreement and the subsequent eruption of violence stunned many partisans of the conflict as well as intermediaries and
Mediation and the Transformation of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
During the 1990s, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict underwent a profound transformation, which has proceeded slowly and sometimes with severe disruptions and retrogressions. This article examines the
The Determinants of Palestinians' Attitudes Toward Peace with Israel
This study explains the variations in the Palestinians' support of the peace process with Israel. It uses multivariate Logit analysis, employing a large public opinion poll conducted in January 2000.
Creating the conditions for peacemaking: theories of practice in ethnic conflict resolution
Establishing the conditions for effective intergroup peacemaking is a formidable task in severe ethnic conflicts. Conflict resolution practitioners argue that a critical first step is developing
Dressing up domination as ‘cooperation’: the case of Israeli-Palestinian water relations
  • Jan Selby
  • Political Science
    Review of International Studies
  • 2002
This article analyses the extent to which Israeli-Palestinian water relations were affected and transformed by the Oslo process. Focusing in turn on the management of water systems and supplies, the
  • Oren Barak
  • Political Science
    International Journal of Middle East Studies
  • 2002
Recent contributions to the study of ethnic conflict, which attempt to explain why and under what circumstances members of ethnic groups, or communities,1 mobilize and engage in violence, include
Visions in Collision: What Happened at Camp David and Taba?
  • J. Pressman
  • Political Science, Sociology
    International Security
  • 2003
alysts have inaccurately portrayed the Israeli-Palestinian-U.S. summit at Camp David in July 2000 and subsequent negotiations. Based on this inaccurate portrayal, a number of observers have argued
Applying a Human Needs Perspective to the Practice of Conflict Resolution: The Israeli—Palestinian Case
How can a human needs perspective inform the practice of conflict resolution? This chapter attempts to answer this question on the basis of my own experience with “interactive problem-solving,” an
The Oslo Agreement as an Obstacle to Peace
The most sophisticated American and Israeli Jewish opponents of the Oslo peace process pay lip service to the agreement while ignoring its political content and insisting that it be understood as a