• DOI:10.1017/S0898588X18000135
• Corpus ID: 150363451

The Failed Diffusion of the Unicameral State Legislature, 1934–1944

@article{Myers2018TheFD,
  title={The Failed Diffusion of the Unicameral State Legislature, 1934–1944},
  author={Adam S. Myers},
  journal={Studies in American Political Development},
  year={2018},
  volume={32},
  pages={217 - 235}
}

• Adam S. Myers
• Published 18 September 2018
• Political Science
• Studies in American Political Development

The early twentieth-century witnessed numerous efforts to reform state government institutions, resulting in the widespread adoption of such reforms as the direct primary and citizen initiative. By contrast, efforts to establish unicameral state legislatures experienced success in just one state: Nebraska. In this article, I examine why movements to adopt one-house legislatures in other states failed in the wake of the Nebraska breakthrough of 1934. Using a most-similar case study research design, I compare the successful Nebraska effort to unsuccessful subsequent efforts in Ohio and Missouri, and I point to rural opposition as being the decisive factor explaining divergent outcomes across the three states. In Nebraska, the lack of malapportionment in the bicameral legislature meant that rural communities did not fear that unicameralism would lead to their diminished influence in state government, but in Ohio and Missouri (where malapportionment was high) rural communities used their structural advantages in state politics to shut down unicameralism efforts. The article's findings suggest that the bicameral state legislature is an important institutional legacy of the bygone era of rural dominance in American politics.