The Failed Diffusion of the Unicameral State Legislature, 1934–1944

@article{Myers2018TheFD,
  title={The Failed Diffusion of the Unicameral State Legislature, 1934–1944},
  author={Adam S. Myers},
  journal={Studies in American Political Development},
  year={2018},
  volume={32},
  pages={217 - 235}
}
  • Adam S. Myers
  • Published 18 September 2018
  • Political Science
  • Studies in American Political Development
The early twentieth-century witnessed numerous efforts to reform state government institutions, resulting in the widespread adoption of such reforms as the direct primary and citizen initiative. By contrast, efforts to establish unicameral state legislatures experienced success in just one state: Nebraska. In this article, I examine why movements to adopt one-house legislatures in other states failed in the wake of the Nebraska breakthrough of 1934. Using a most-similar case study research… 

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 44 REFERENCES
Delegating Direct Democracy: Interparty Legislative Competition and the Adoption of the Initiative in the American States
Between 1898 and 1918, voters in 20 American states adopted constitutional amendments granting citizens the power of the initiative. The embrace of direct democracy by voters invites inquiry into why
One House: The Unicameral's Progressive Vision for Nebraska
When Nebraskans voted to trade in their bicameral, partisan legislature for a one-house, nonpartisan body in 1934, it was a revolutionary decision. The people of the state listened to George Norris,
A New Answer for an Old Question: Should Alaska Once Again Consider a Unicameral Legislature?
A half-century after the creation of the Alaska legislature, is it still in the state’s interests to have a two-house legislative system? At Alaska’s Constitutional Convention, the framers gave great
Where Politicians Gave Power to the People
What led elites in some U.S. states to surrender policy-making power to voters between 1898 and 1918, while leaders elsewhere retained only representative democracy? The authors argue that
Malapportionment and Public Policy in the States
  • T. Dye
  • Political Science
    The Journal of Politics
  • 1965
C OMMENTATORS ON STATE POLICY have often implied that malapportionment seriously affects the policy choices of state legislatures. In the literature on state politics it is frequently argued that
More Democracy: The Direct Primary and Competition in U.S. Elections
This article offers a first-ever comprehensive empirical assessment of a key Progressive reform, the direct primary, and its impact on competition in American elections. We begin with a review of the
Democratic Laboratories: Policy Diffusion among the American States
The diffusion of ideas and practices is fundamental to our national way of life. In areas from technology to commerce to religion, Americans presume that good ideas will flourish. But in a country
Direct Democracy and Political Parties in America
We examine the origins of direct democracy in the American states and assess how direct democracy has affected American political parties. We find adoption of the most directly democratic forms of
THE DIFFUSION OF INNOVATIONS AMONG THE AMERICAN STATES*
Jack was a contributor to many fields. After I invited Jack to give a lecture some years ago, a colleague stopped me to say how glad he was that a theorist was visiting. Another thanked me for
Policy Diffusion and the Pro-innovation Bias
Existing research on policy diffusion focuses almost exclusively on “successes” where many jurisdictions adopted the policy or policies under examination. Some have speculated that this
...
1
2
3
4
5
...