The Evolutionary History of the Australopiths

@article{Strait2010TheEH,
  title={The Evolutionary History of the Australopiths},
  author={David S. Strait},
  journal={Evolution: Education and Outreach},
  year={2010},
  volume={3},
  pages={341-352}
}
  • D. Strait
  • Published 2010
  • Biology
  • Evolution: Education and Outreach
The australopiths are a group of early hominins (humans and their close extinct relatives) that lived in Africa between approximately 4.1 and 1.4 million years ago. Formerly known as the australopithecines, they are not a “natural” group, in that they do not represent all of the descendants of a single common ancestor (i.e., they are not a “clade”). Rather, they are grouped together informally because nearly all share a similar adaptive grade (i.e., they have similar adaptations). In particular… Expand

Figures and Tables from this paper

The First Hominins and the Origins of Bipedalism
TLDR
Molecular and paleontological evidence now point to the last common ancestor between chimpanzees and modern humans living between five and seven million years ago, which is close to the root of the hominin lineage. Expand
The femur of Orrorin tugenensis exhibits morphometric affinities with both Miocene apes and later hominins.
TLDR
The results indicate that both hominin and modern great ape femora evolved in different directions from a primitive morphology represented by some fossil apes, consistent with femoral shape similarities in extant great apes being derived and homoplastic. Expand
Names, They Are A-Changing
The fossil record of human ancestors is dense compared to the fossil record for many other branches on the tree of life. For example, though thousands of fossils from hominins (organisms that areExpand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 112 REFERENCES
Australopithecus sediba: A New Species of Homo-Like Australopith from South Africa
TLDR
Combined craniodental and postcranial evidence demonstrates that this new species of Australopithecus shares more derived features with early Homo than any other australopith species and thus might help reveal the ancestor of that genus. Expand
Asa Issie, Aramis and the origin of Australopithecus
TLDR
New fossils from the Middle Awash study area that extend the known Au. Expand
Body proportions of Australopithecus afarensis and A. africanus and the origin of the genus Homo.
TLDR
New discoveries of A. africanus fossils from Member 4 Sterkfontein reveal a body form quite unlike earlier Australopithecus species, and postcranial material reveals an apparently primitive morphology of relatively large forelimb and small hindlimb joints resembling more the pongid than the human pattern. Expand
Was the Early Pliocene hominin 'Australopithecus' anamensis a hard object feeder?
TLDR
Although ‘A.’ anamensis appears to have had the trophic capability to process a fairly wide range of foods, including the hard, brittle items that might be expected in the sorts of environments in which it is found, those few individuals the authors have been able to sample do not appear to have ingested these sorts of items while their microwear was being formed. Expand
Ardipithecus ramidus and the Paleobiology of Early Hominids
TLDR
Ardipithecus ramidus indicates that despite the genetic similarities of living humans and chimpanzees, the ancestor the authors last shared probably differed substantially from any extant African ape. Expand
The locomotor anatomy of Australopithecus afarensis.
TLDR
It is demonstrated that A. afarensis possessed anatomic characteristics that indicate a significant adaptation for movement in the trees, and it is speculated that earlier representatives of the A.Afarensis lineage will present not a combination of arboreal and bipedal traits, but rather the anatomy of a generalized ape. Expand
The feeding biomechanics and dietary ecology of Australopithecus africanus
TLDR
It is suggested that the mastication of either small objects or large volumes of food is unlikely to fully explain the evolution of facial form in this species, and key aspects of australopith craniofacial morphology are more likely to be related to the ingestion and initial preparation of large, mechanically protected food objects like large nuts and seeds. Expand
Sexual dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis was similar to that of modern humans
TLDR
These data eliminate some apparent discrepancies between the canine and skeletal size dimorphism in hominoids, imply that the species was not characterized by substantial sexual bimaturation, and greatly increase the probability that the reproductive strategy of A. afarensis was principally monogamy. Expand
Australopithecus, Homo erectus and the single species hypothesis
TLDR
The evidence presented here deals not with the earlier stages of human evolution, but with the unequivocal occurrence of H. erectus from the Koobi Fora Formation, east of Lake Turkana (formerly Lake Rudolf). Expand
Orrorin tugenensis Femoral Morphology and the Evolution of Hominin Bipedalism
TLDR
Femoral morphology indicates that Orrorin tugenensis shared distinctive hip biomechanics with australopiths, suggesting that this complex evolved early in human evolution and persisted for almost 4 million years until modifications of the hip appeared in the late Pliocene in early Homo. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...