The Evolution of the Linnaean Hierarchy

@article{Ereshefsky1997TheEO,
  title={The Evolution of the Linnaean Hierarchy},
  author={Marc Ereshefsky},
  journal={Biology and Philosophy},
  year={1997},
  volume={12},
  pages={493-519}
}
The Linnaean system of classification is a threefold system of theoretical assumptions, sorting rules, and rules of nomenclature. Over time, that system has lost its theoretical assumptions as well as its sorting rules. Cladistic revisions have left it less and less Linnaean. And what remains of the system is flawed on pragmatic grounds. Taking all of this into account, it is time to consider alternative systems of classification. 
Why do we name organisms? Some reminders from the past
TLDR
It is concluded that the lower level of Linnaeus' hierarchy is a special case of the noun + adjective combination that pervade folk classifications in particular and human language in general.
On recent arguments for phylogenetic nomenclature
TLDR
It is suggested that apomorphy-based phylogenetic definitions of taxon names are preferable to other types of definitions, for both historical reasons (apparent similarity to existing Linnaean definitions, ability to fix "key" innovations to the diagnoses of higher taxa), and practical reasons (being useful in poorly resolved groups).
Classes or Individuals? The Paradox of Systematics Revisited
Bucket thinking:the future framework for evolutionary explanation
TLDR
Hierarchy Theory and the Sloshing Bucket need to be made precise, developed and updated in light of an explosion of new discoveries and fields and philosophical issues.
Learning from Linnaeus: towards developing the foundation for a general structure concept for morphology*
TLDR
Taking a closer look at Linnaeus’ sexual system, basic principles for developing a general structure concept for morphology are discussed, which would provide the conceptual basis for establishing a high degree of aperspectival objectivity for morphological data.
Phylogeny of the eureptantic nemerteans revisited
TLDR
The phylogeny of the eureptantic nemerteans is revisited, and three species not present in the original analyses by Härlin & Sundberg (1995) are included and in the light of the new results the phylogenetic taxonomy as well as biogeography of the Eureptantia is discussed.
The PhyloCode, or alternative nomenclature: Why it is not beneficial to palaeontology, either
TLDR
It is argued herein, why palaeontologists should not fol− low Phylogenetic Nomenclature, which is radically different from the current standard.
Taxonomic names and phylogenetic trees
This paper addresses the issue of philosophy of names within the context of biological taxonomy, more specifically how names refer. By contrasting two philosophies of names, one that is based on the
...
1
2
3
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 27 REFERENCES
Some Problems with the Linnaean Hierarchy
TLDR
This paper illustrates the problems facing the Linnaean system, and ends with a brief introduction to an alternative approach to biological classification.
LOGIC AND MEMORY IN LINNAEUS'S SYSTEM OF TAXONOMY.
TLDR
The principles on which Linnaeus based his taxonomy are shown to be, at least in intention, primarily Aristotelian; it is suggested that the principles of Logical Division may still be a powerful source of unwarranted bias in modern classifications.
The Future of Linnaean Nomenclature
TLDR
The present paper is intended to initiate debate among phylogenetic systematists about what formal conventions are needed to achieve the aim of representing phylogenies without ambiguity.
On the Origin of Species: Facsimile of the First Edition
This is really going to save you time and your money in something should think about. If you're seeking then search around for online. Without a doubt there are several these available and a lot of
Some Fundamental Problems in Biological Classification
TLDR
Difficulties in the theory of each of the three main contemporary schools of systematic philosophy are discussed and it is suggested that members of all schools would benefit from some self-criticism and reexamination of some of their theoretical postulates.
Contemporary perspectives on Linnaeus
A collection of essays on the Swedish botanist and taxonomist, Carl Linnaeus, written by nine internationally distinguished scholars. The essays discuss the impact of Linnaeus and his work on the
Consistency and Monophyly
TLDR
The purposes of this paper are to show that the relationship which George G. Simpson chose as the relation which is to hold between classification and phylogeny is so weak that few implications of a type specific enough to contradict a classifier's views concerning phylogeny can be inferred from a classification.
Some Future Developments in Taxonomy
TLDR
It is no longer fantastic to imagine that man might reach a new planet and find there a rich biota, and under such circumstances taxonomists would have an opportunity to design a biotaxonomy better than the one the authors now use.
Principles of systematic zoology
  • E. Mayr
  • Biology, Environmental Science
  • 1969
The science of taxonomy the species category species taxa intrapopulational variational variation and the comparison of population samples specification and taxonomic decisions the theory of
...
1
2
3
...