The Evolution of Dominance

@article{WrightTheEO,
  title={The Evolution of Dominance},
  author={Sewall Wright},
  journal={The American Naturalist},
  volume={63},
  pages={556 - 561}
}
  • S. Wright
  • Published 1 November 1929
  • Economics
  • The American Naturalist
There seems little probability of direct evidence upon so subtle a question. I have myself attached a good deal of importance, in other connections, to gene ratios held in stable equilibrium, though it never occurred to me that such a state was universal. Even if it were nearly so, the conditions on which the stability rests must be liable to change; stability may turn to instability, a transient state, admittedly, but one in which a minute, but steadily increasing, selective intensity would be… 

The evolution and nature of dominance.

  • J. Crosby
  • Biology
    Journal of theoretical biology
  • 1963

ON THE ROLES OF DIRECTED AND RANDOM CHANGES IN GENE FREQUENCY IN THE GENETICS OF POPULATIONS

  • S. Wright
  • Geology
    Evolution; international journal of organic evolution
  • 1948
Science has largely advanced by the analytic procedure of isolating the effects of single factors in carefully controlled experiments. The task of science is not complete, however, without synthesis:

Fisher's theory of evolution of dominance

  • A. Vetta
  • Psychology
    Advances in Applied Probability
  • 1981
The phenomenon of dominance has interested research workers since the rediscovery of Mendelism at the turn of the century. Fisher was, however, interested in the origin of dominance. In 1928 he

On the evolution of dominance

TLDR
Fisher's theory of the evolution of dominance states that if an unfavourable gene is continuously being produced by mutation, other genes which modify the action of this gene will eventually be selected which will give individuals carrying the gene a phenotype resembling the favoured wild-type phenotype.

Further notes on the evolution of dominance

TLDR
Fisher's formula has been discussed recently by the author, an analysis is made of a process which Parsons and Bodmer (1961) suggest may lead to the evolution of dominance, various factors concerned in the Evolution of dominance process are summarised and their relative importance discussed.

On the evolution of dominance modifiers I. A nonlinear analysis.

  • R. Bürger
  • Mathematics
    Journal of theoretical biology
  • 1983

Unresolved boundaries of evolutionary theory and the question of how inheritance systems evolve: 75 years of debate on the evolution of dominance.

  • H. C. Bagheri
  • Biology
    Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution
  • 2006
TLDR
The history of several intellectual and methodological traditions that have contributed to this debate are traced, including experimental genetics, theoretical population genetics and theoretical biochemistry, and it is argued that contrary to the prevalent view, the evolution of dominance is not a resolved issue.

The probability distribution of gene-differences in relation to selection, mutation, and random extinction

In order to determine the mathematical form of the distribution of gene frequencies in a population, R. A. Fisher (1, 2) applied two different but complementary methods. First, differential equations
...