The Evolution of Common Law

@article{Gennaioli2007TheEO,
  title={The Evolution of Common Law},
  author={Nicola Gennaioli and A. Shleifer},
  journal={Journal of Political Economy},
  year={2007},
  volume={115},
  pages={43 - 68}
}
  • Nicola Gennaioli, A. Shleifer
  • Published 2007
  • Economics
  • Journal of Political Economy
  • We present a model of lawmaking by appellate courts in which judges influenced by policy preferences can distinguish precedents at some cost. We find a cost and a benefit of diversity of judicial views. Policy‐motivated judges distort the law away from efficiency, but diversity of judicial views also fosters legal evolution and increases the law’s precision. We call our central finding the Cardozo theorem: even when judges are motivated by personal agendas, legal evolution is, on average… CONTINUE READING
    223 Citations
    The Evolution of a Legal Rule
    Legal Change: Integrating Selective Litigation, Judicial Preferences, and Precedent
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    Overruling and the Instability of Law
    • 27
    • PDF
    Overruling and the instability of law
    • 33
    • PDF
    Endogenous Legal Traditions
    • 10
    Endogenous Cases and the Evolution of Common Law
    • Highly Influenced
    1 Overruling and the Instability of Law
    • 1
    • PDF
    Case Law versus Statute Law: An Evolutionary Comparison
    • 77
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    Legal Change: Selective Litigation, Judicial Bias, and Precedent
    • 25
    • PDF
    An Equilibrium Model of Lawmaking
    • 1

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 57 REFERENCES
    Overruling and the Instability of Law
    • 27
    • PDF
    Case Law versus Statute Law: An Evolutionary Comparison
    • 77
    • PDF
    Liability rules, limited information, and the role of precedent
    • 83
    The Common Law Process and the Selection of Efficient Rules
    • G. Priest
    • Economics
    • The Journal of Legal Studies
    • 1977
    • 438
    Contracting in the Shadow of the Law
    • 66
    • PDF
    Can Litigation Improve the Law without the Help of Judges?
    • 174
    • PDF
    Why Is the Common Law Efficient?
    • 470
    ON THE NATURE OF SUPREME COURT DECISION MAKING
    • 277
    Judicial Checks and Balances
    • 628
    • PDF