The Equivalence of Remote Electronic and Paper Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Collection.

@article{GriffithsJones2014TheEO,
  title={The Equivalence of Remote Electronic and Paper Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Collection.},
  author={W Griffiths-Jones and Mark R. Norton and Edwin D. Fern and Dan H Williams},
  journal={The Journal of arthroplasty},
  year={2014},
  volume={29 11},
  pages={2136-9}
}
Individual patient level Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) are increasingly important in clinical practice. Web-based collection enables clinicians to remotely collect scores at regular intervals, away from the clinic setting. In this randomized crossover study, 47 patients, having undergone hip surgery, were allocated to two groups. Group 1 completed the web-based scores followed by the paper equivalents one week later; Group 2 completed the scores the other way around. The Intraclass… CONTINUE READING