The Equal Weight Argument Against Religious Exclusivism

  title={The Equal Weight Argument Against Religious Exclusivism},
  author={Samuel Ruhmkorff},
  • Samuel Ruhmkorff
  • Published 2013
  • Political Science
  • In the last decade, analytic epistemologists have engaged in a lively debate about Equal Weight, the claim that you should give the credences of epistemic peers the same consideration as your own credences. In this paper, I explore the implications of the debate about Equal Weight for how we should respond to religious disagreement found in the diversity of models of God. I first claim that one common argument against religious exclusivism and for religious pluralism can be articulated as an… CONTINUE READING


    Religious Belief and the Epistemology of Disagreement
    • 8
    Religious Ambiguity and Religious Diversity
    • 35
    Salvations: Truth and Difference in Religion
    • 100
    Religious Diversity and its Challenges to Religious Belief
    • 17
    Exclusivism versus pluralism in religion: a response to Kevin Meeker
    • 7
    Truth and the Diversity of Religions
    • 37
    The possibility of religious pluralism : A reply to Gavin D'Costa
    • 18
    Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience
    • 253
    • PDF