Corpus ID: 73632764

The Epitome of an Insult: A Constitutional Approach to Designated Fighting Words

@article{Friedlieb2005TheEO,
  title={The Epitome of an Insult: A Constitutional Approach to Designated Fighting Words},
  author={Linda Friedlieb},
  journal={University of Chicago Law Review},
  year={2005},
  volume={72},
  pages={19}
}
  • Linda Friedlieb
  • Published 2005
  • Political Science
  • University of Chicago Law Review
A man in a bar tells a police officer who asks for identification, "You're not the fucking gestapo, you don't have any right to do this."' A union member in New York City tells a replacement worker crossing a picket line, "[W]hen the cops leave, the blood is going to run off of your bald fucking head."2 A white teenager burns a cross in the front yard of a family of mixed race.A man drives past another car that he feels is moving too slowly and uses his middle finger in an obscene gesture… Expand
The Doubtful Validity of Victim-Specific Libel Laws
Laws that single out for penalty defamation of certain individuals undermine the principle that government may not discriminate within a category of expression. The Supreme Court affirmed in R.A.V.Expand
Do offensive words harm people
The harm thesis—the assumption that words harm people—is a defining feature of sexual harassment, hate speech, verbal abuse, and obscene telephone call (OTC) offenses. This thesis ignores theExpand
Liberty or death? The framing of hate speech in the printed press