The Emerging Politics of DHS Fusion Centers

@article{Monahan2009TheEP,
  title={The Emerging Politics of DHS Fusion Centers},
  author={Torin Monahan and Neal A. Palmer},
  journal={Security Dialogue},
  year={2009},
  volume={40},
  pages={617 - 636}
}
This article explores public concerns about the US Department of Homeland Security’s data ‘fusion centers’. These centers, which are proliferating across all US states, coordinate data-sharing among state and local police, intelligence agencies, and private companies. The primary goal of fusion centers is to engage in intelligence-sharing for counter-terrorism purposes. However, they have been used for a variety of other purposes, such as basic policing, spying on social movement organizations… 

Data Sharing, Privacy and Organizational History: DHS Fusion Centers

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), under both the Bush and Obama administrations, has supported the creation of 'fusion centers' with a mandate to share data across government agencies as

Beyond Counterterrorism: Data Sharing, Privacy, and Organizational Histories of DHS Fusion Centers

TLDR
Based on intensive qualitative research, the authors have found that fusion centers that were originally oriented toward "counterterrorism" have quickly broadened their scope to include all crimes, and those that began as "all crimes" have migrated only marginally to terrorism.

The failure of police ‘fusion’ centers and the concept of a national intelligence sharing plan

The National Criminal Intelligence Sharing Plan (NCISP) originated primarily in response to the September 11 attacks with the intended goal of improving the coordination of law enforcement agencies

The Rise of the Fusion-Intelligence Complex: A critique of political surveillance after 9/11

This paper argues that 'fusion centers' are byproducts of the privatization of state surveillance and assaults on civil liberties, at least in the United States, the nation on which the research is

The Future of Security? Surveillance Operations at Homeland Security Fusion Centers

THE U.S. "WAR ON TERROR" HAS FUELED REMARKABLE DEVELOPMENTS IN STATE surveillance. In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the country witnessed a rise in domestic spying

Law Enforcement Fusion Centers: Cultivating an Information Sharing Environment while Safeguarding Privacy

The national network of fusion centers, of which there are currently 78 nationwide, was created in response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and continue to play an integral role in

Fusion Center Accountability and Intergovernmental Information Sharing

Following the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the states cooperated in the establishment of fusion centers to facilitate sharing of data across

Law Enforcement’s Information Sharing Infrastructure

The September 11 attacks impacted society generally, and law enforcement specifically, in dramatic ways. One of the major trends has been changing expectations regarding criminal intelligence

Using a Fusion Center Model to Manage and Improve Border Security

ABSTRACT Recent civil wars have led to a mass migration movement of people attempting to escape their homeland. This has left many nations scrambling to devise not only how they are going to manage

Making up ‘Terror Identities’: security intelligence, Canada's Integrated Threat Assessment Centre and social movement suppression

Drawing on analysis of government records obtained using Access to Information Act (ATIA) requests, we examine policing and surveillance projects developed in preparation for three mega-events that
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 100 REFERENCES

The Intensification of surveillance: crime, terrorism and warfare in the information era

Our public and private lives are under surveillance as never before. Whether we are shopping with a credit card, walking down the street or emailing a colleague at work, our activities are monitored.

Securing the Homeland: Torture, Preparedness, and the Right to Let Die

MODERN SECURITY REGIMES ARE DEFINED BY EXTREMES. PRACTICES OF SPYING, torture, indefinite detention, and preemptive war represent favored responses by the United States to the threats of insecurity

Surveillance after September 11

The aftermath of terrorist attacks on September 11 2001 includes widespread tightening of surveillance. The responses are a prism that puts several things in perspective. One, it is premature to see

Terrorism and the politics of fear

This article examines how news reports about terrorism in five nationally prominent U.S. newspapers reflect the terms and discourse associated with the politics of fear, or decision makers' promotion

The Terror of Neoliberalism: Authoritarianism and the Eclipse of Democracy

essentially dross. Mildred Schwartz and Kay Lawson also go beyond American concerns to examine trends in party systems and cleavage structures West-wide, observing that because parties are not seen

Passports, Mobility, and Security: How smart can the border be?

After September 11, 2001, a great deal of public and policy attention has been devoted to border security, passports, and the global mobility regime. This article examines the context of the global

Surveillance and Security: Technological Politics and Power in Everyday Life

This is a volume of original contributions from scholars in eight different humanities and social science disciplines. The aim of the book is to present a range of surveillance technologies used in

Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity

Anarchy as Order is the third in a series of related books by Mohammed Bamyeh. Framed most broadly, Anarchy as Order explores that myriad of issues and contestations associated with moving from a

“War Rooms” of the Street: Surveillance Practices in Transportation Control Centers

This article investigates the surveillance dimensions of “intelligent transportation systems” in the United States, with a particular focus on the mediation of data by engineers in transportation
...