• DOI:10.1097/00001888-200101000-00007
• Corpus ID: 31653834

The Effects of a Changing Environment on Relationships between Medical Schools and Their Parent Universities

@article{Nonnemaker2001TheEO,
  title={The Effects of a Changing Environment on Relationships between Medical Schools and Their Parent Universities},
  author={Lynn Nonnemaker and Paul F. Griner},
  journal={Academic Medicine},
  year={2001},
  volume={76},
  pages={9–18}
}

• L. Nonnemaker, P. Griner
• Published 1 January 2001
• Medicine, Education
• Academic Medicine

Medical schools differ from other university graduate schools in that community settings, hospitals, and ambulatory care facilities are required for medical education, and most of these settings are either owned by or closely affiliated with the university. Thus, the extraordinary changes in recent years in the organization, delivery, and financing of health care have required the attention not only of the leadership of academic medical centers (i.e., medical schools and their owned or closely affiliated teaching hospitals) but also of the administrators and boards of their parent universities. Many university-wide structures and policies that previously served the medical school well in accomplishing these missions may now be viewed as inflexible by the faculty and administration of the school. Conversely, the historically distant governance and administrative oversight of the medical school has become a concern for some at the university, given the huge budgets of the school, its faculty practice, and its affiliated hospital(s). From information derived mainly from annual visits to 14 medical schools from 1996 through June 2000, the authors review the issues between medical schools and their parent universities and the strategies being used to resolve them. These strategies include changes in the governance, organization, and management of the medical school, such as unified authority for health affairs, reengineered administrative systems, and increased autonomy in decision making. The authors conclude that these strategies appear to be working on behalf of not only the medical school but, in some instances, the university at large. They also comment on possible negative implications of the greater separation of the medical school from its parent university.