• Corpus ID: 141673328

The Effects of Motivational Interviewing with the Dual Diagnosis Population

  title={The Effects of Motivational Interviewing with the Dual Diagnosis Population},
  author={Martina S. Moore},
The Effects of Motivational Interviewing in Intensive Outpatient Programs by Martina Moore MA, John Carroll University, 2000 BA, Notre Dame College, 1997 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Counselor Education and Supervision Walden University May 2015 Abstract Dual diagnosis clients continue to have low treatment completion rates. The purpose of the current study was to understand if motivational interviewing helped to… 


Motivational interviewing (MI) is an evidence-based counselling technique that is used by psychologists, doctors, nurses, midwives and social workers as an effective intervention aimed at behavioural



What Can Motivational Interviewing Do for You

The impact of motivational interviewing on resistance in cognitive behavioural therapy for generalized anxiety disorder

Resistance, but not homework compliance, was found to strongly and directly mediate the relationship between treatment group and worry reduction, and suggest that MI improves treatment outcomes when added to CBT for generalized anxiety by reducing client resistance to, and increasing client engagement with treatment.

Extending Motivational Interviewing to the Treatment of Major Mental Health Problems: Current Directions and Evidence

A substantial body of promising preliminary findings strongly support the continued investigation of MI and related methods for these populations in well-designed clinical trials that examine not only the additive value of MI but also mechanisms underlying these effects and individual differences (moderators) indicating the need for MI.

A randomized controlled pilot study of motivational interviewing for patients with psychotic and drug use disorders.

The findings indicate that MI may not work equally well for all types of psychotic disordered dually diagnosed patients and that alternative approaches may be as effective in fostering improved substance use treatment outcomes for subgroups of these individuals.

Brief motivational feedback may enhance treatment entry in veterans with comorbid substance use and psychiatric disorders.

The preliminary findings extend the use of motivational feedback to facilitate entry into substance abuse treatment among veteran patients with comorbid substance use and psychiatric disorders to suggest opportunity for more effective patient-treatment matching based on initial motivation and other individual factors such as psychiatricComorbidity.

Motivational Pharmacotherapy: Combining Motivational Interviewing and Antidepressant Therapy to Improve Treatment Adherence

Treatment non-adherence in psycho-pharmacotherapy remains a significant challenge to the effective clinical management of psychiatric disorders, especially among underserved racial/ethnic groups.

Does Motivational Interviewing (MI) Work with Nonaddicted Clients? A Controlled Study Measuring the Effects of a Brief Training in MI on Client Outcomes.

Motivational interviewing (MI) is an innovative, collaborative method of drawing forth and enhancing client's motivation for change (Miller & Rollnick, 2002). Originally developed as a process for

Does Motivational Interviewing Stages of Change Increase Treatment Retention among Persons Who Are Alcohol and Other Drug Dependent and HIV Infected?

Results showed that utilizing MI and the stages of change model did not increase the number of days in treatment, nor was there an increase in treatment completion, and suggest that those with multiple problems requiring an array of change stages to monitor may not benefit from this model.

Dual Diagnosis Capability in Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Treatment Programs

Assessment of programs’ capacity to meet the needs of clients with dual diagnosis, identifies areas where they are well equipped to serve these clients, and determines where programmatic improvement is needed suggests that programs in the sample are functioning at a nearly dual diagnosis–capable level.