The Effect of a Supreme Court Decision Regarding Gay Marriage on Social Norms and Personal Attitudes

@article{Tankard2017TheEO,
  title={The Effect of a Supreme Court Decision Regarding Gay Marriage on Social Norms and Personal Attitudes},
  author={Margaret E. Tankard and Elizabeth Levy Paluck},
  journal={Psychological Science},
  year={2017},
  volume={28},
  pages={1334 - 1344}
}
We propose that institutions such as the U.S. Supreme Court can lead individuals to update their perceptions of social norms, in contrast to the mixed evidence on whether institutions shape individuals’ personal opinions. We studied reactions to the June 2015 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in favor of same-sex marriage. In a controlled experimental setting, we found that a favorable ruling, when presented as likely, shifted perceived norms and personal attitudes toward increased support for gay… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

The Impact of Laws on Norms Perceptions

Results indicate that pluralistic ignorance may be more resilient to change and highlight that laws can have a dual impact on societies, changing not only the legal situation but also shifting perceptions of societal norms.

Democratic Norms, Social Projection, and False Consensus in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election

Abstract We examine individuals’ views about democratic norm violations related to the peaceful transfer of power and acceptance of election results and the link between those views and broader

Framing Effects, Social Norm Perception, and Tolerance of Lesbian and Gay Individuals: Experimental Evidence from Slovakia.

It is found that while positively valenced messages shifted perceptions toward tolerance, manipulating point of view and group-centrism did not and it is believed that these findings can inform interventions intended to shift perceptions of social norms in hostile contexts.

Religion, Contact, and Ambivalent Attitudes Toward the Rights of Gays and Lesbians in Barbados

Analysis of whether heterosexuals in Barbados are consistent or ambivalent in their attitudes toward anti-gay law reform and the extent to which competing messages from interpersonal contact and religion affect ambivalence revealed that a majority of heterosexuals hold ambivalent attitudes about gay and lesbian rights.

Same-sex marriage legalization associated with reduced implicit and explicit antigay bias

While antigay bias had been decreasing over time, following local same-sex marriage legalization antIGay bias decreased at roughly double the rate, indicating that government legislation can inform attitudes even on religiously and politically entrenched positions.

It's complicated: The impact of marriage legalization among sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals in the United States.

Perceptions of the impact of marriage legalization in all U.S. states among sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals are explored, highlighting the importance of policies that advance equality for sexual and gender minorities (SGMs), as well as the need of research exploring how policies are perceived by and impact SGM subpopulations.

Perceptions of intolerant norms both facilitate and inhibit collective action among sexual minorities

This article presents the results of three studies that examine how the perceived opinions of others are related to sexual minorities’ support for social change toward greater equality. Results of

United States Normative Attitudes for Pursuing Parenthood as a Function of Gender, Sexual Orientation, and Age

Decisions about whether or not to become a parent are significant parts of normative human development. Many studies have shown that married different-sex couples are expected to become parents, and

The Impact of Marriage Equality on Sexual Minority Women’s Relationships With Their Families of Origin

Interviews with 20 SMW were conducted to learn about their perceptions of how support from families of origin had been impacted by or changed since the U.S. Supreme Court decision on same-sex marriage, and stories revealed stories of continued family support; increases in acceptance or support; mixed support/rejection or unclear messages; and continued or increased family rejection.

Attitudes Towards LGBT Individuals After bostock v. Clayton County: Evidence From a Quasi Experiment

Do United States Supreme Court decisions on LGBT rights shape attitudes towards LGBT individuals among the mass public? In this paper, I conduct an empirical test of the effect of quasi-random
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 44 REFERENCES

Does Policy Adoption Change Opinions on Minority Rights? The Effects of Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage

The Iowa Supreme Court adopted an unpopular but unanimous ruling in Varnum v. Brien, which established same-sex marriage. Using a unique panel study conducted immediately before and after the court

Public Opinion, the Attitudinal Model, and Supreme Court Decision Making: A Micro-Analytic Perspective

Recent aggregate-level research on the United States Supreme Court suggests that shifting tides of public opinion can have important effects on Supreme Court decisions. Moreover, these effects can be

Public Opinion, the Courts, and Same-sex Marriage

Social scientists often have been called upon to weigh in on social issues, and same-sex marriage is no exception. We draw on quantitative and qualitative data from a national survey to evaluate four

Norm Perception as a Vehicle for Social Change

How can we change social norms, the standards describing typical or desirable behavior? Because individuals’ perceptions of norms guide their personal behavior, influencing these perceptions is one

Opinion Backlash and Public Attitudes: Are Political Advances in Gay Rights Counterproductive?

One long-recognized consequence of the tension between popular sovereignty and democratic values like liberty and equality is public opinion backlash, which occurs when individuals recoil in response

The Supreme Court and Local Public Opinion

Most research suggests that the mass public knows very little about the Supreme Court and, consequently, that decisions do not affect attitudes toward the Court. I argue that where there is

The salience of social referents: a field experiment on collective norms and harassment behavior in a school social network.

It is demonstrated that changing the public behavior of a randomly assigned subset of student social referents changes their peers' perceptions of school collective norms and their harassment behavior, clarifying the development of collective social norms.

The Legitimacy-conferring Authority of the U.S. Supreme Court

Convention holds that the Supreme Court, because of its special constitutional role, can confer an element of legitimacy on a policy simply by endorsing it. In this study, we conducted an experiment

Explaining Processes of Institutional Opinion Leadership

When and how can institutions lead public opinion? Scholarly controversy exists over whether even a highly esteemed institution such as the Supreme Court can move mass opinion. In this study we use

Changing Racial Beliefs by Providing Consensus Information

In two experiments, the authors found that providing feedback to European American participants that others held different beliefs about African Americans than they originally estimated significantly