The Dynamics of Coordinated Group Hunting and Collective Information Transfer among Schooling Prey

@article{Handegard2012TheDO,
  title={The Dynamics of Coordinated Group Hunting and Collective Information Transfer among Schooling Prey},
  author={Nils Olav Handegard and Kevin Mershon Boswell and Christos C. Ioannou and Simon Leblanc and Dag B. Tj{\o}stheim and Iain D. Couzin},
  journal={Current Biology},
  year={2012},
  volume={22},
  pages={1213-1217}
}

Figures from this paper

Predatory Fish Select for Coordinated Collective Motion in Virtual Prey
TLDR
It is demonstrated that collective motion could evolve as a response to predation, without prey being able to detect and respond to predators.
Both Prey and Predator Features Determine Predation Risk and Survival of Schooling Prey
TLDR
High-resolution tracking of solitary predators (Northern pike) hunting schooling fish (golden shiners) provides detailed insights into predator decision-making but shows which key spatial and kinematic features of predator and prey influence individual’s risk to be targeted and survive attacks.
Fish waves as emergent collective antipredator behavior
A Sensory-Driven Trade-Off between Coordinated Motion in Social Prey and a Predator’s Visual Confusion
TLDR
A trade-off between the sensory mechanisms that can enhance the collective properties that emerge in social animals and the individual group member’s predation risk during an attack is demonstrated.
Effects of successive predator attacks on prey aggregations
TLDR
The results suggest that both aerial and underwater predators are more efficient at disturbing fish schools by increasing their attack frequency at such level that the fish cannot return to swarming/schooling.
Fisheries-induced selection against schooling behaviour in marine fishes
TLDR
An individual-based model is used to explore the evolution of fish schooling behaviour in a range of environments, including natural and human-dominated predation conditions, and suggests that social behaviour should be added to the list of traits subject to fishery-induced evolution.
Social Foraging and Predator-Prey Interactions
TLDR
Most of the principles discussed in this chapter may also be applied to animals that are searching for mates, water, minerals, nesting materials, tools or any other contestable item or substance that they may require in order to function.
Proto-cooperation: group hunting sailfish improve hunting success by alternating attacks on grouping prey
TLDR
It is shown that group hunting provides major efficiency gains for individuals in groups of up to 70 members, and that a free riding strategy, where some individuals wait until the prey are sufficiently injured before attacking, is only beneficial if the cost of attacking is high, and only then when waiting times are short.
Fine-scale behavioural adjustments of prey on a continuum of risk
TLDR
This study provides evidence that prey do not adopt a uniform response to the presence of a predator and demonstrates that prey are capable of rapidly and dynamically updating their assessment of risk and showing fine-scale adjustments to their behaviour.
A multidimensional framework for studying social predation strategies
TLDR
A framework for evaluating social predation strategies according to five key behavioural dimensions is outlined, highlighting key commonalities and differences among species, and informative cross-dimensional correlations.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 42 REFERENCES
The Effect of Prey Density on Predators: Conspicuousness and Attack Success Are Sensitive to Spatial Scale
TLDR
It is demonstrated that increasing the density of Daphnia magna swarms increases conspicuousness to a natural predator, the three‐spined stickleback, providing a perceptual basis for the importance of spatial scale in density‐dependent processes.
Predator preferences for attacking particular prey group sizes: consequences for predator hunting success and prey predation risk
TLDR
Per capita predation risk is lower than in small shoals, and joining larger shoals should be advantageous for individual guppies, but cichlids would do better in terms of hunting success by attacking small rather than large shoals.
Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish
TLDR
Comparing data from two-fish and three-fish shoals challenges the standard assumption that individual motion results from averaging responses to each neighbor considered separately and finds no evidence for explicit matching of body orientation.
Predicting the optimal prey group size from predator hunting behaviour.
TLDR
Redshanks most commonly formed group sizes that gained the maximum individual predation risk reduction, but that continued to reducepredation risk by lowering attack success rate, and which of the three thresholds, on their own or in combination, predicted the most commonly observed group size.
The scaling of locomotor performance in predator-prey encounters: from fish to killer whales.
  • P. Domenici
  • Environmental Science
    Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology
  • 2001
Group transmission of predator avoidance behaviour in a marine insect: The trafalgar effect
Scale-free correlations in starling flocks
TLDR
It is suggested that flocks behave as critical systems, poised to respond maximally to environmental perturbations, through scale-free behavioral correlations, which provide each animal with an effective perception range much larger than the direct interindividual interaction range, thus enhancing global response to perturbation.
PREDATOR VIGILANCE AND GROUP SIZE IN MAMMALS AND BIRDS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE
  • M. Elgar
  • Environmental Science
    Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • 1989
TLDR
Most of the studies fail to adequately demonstrate an unambiguous relationship between vigilance behaviour and group size, but many studies reveal interesting features of the relationship between Vigilance and Group size that should provide fruitful avenues for future research.
Stability criteria for complex ecosystems
TLDR
The criteria to prove that the probability of stability for predator–prey networks decreases when a realistic food web structure is imposed or if there is a large preponderance of weak interactions are used, and stability is negatively affected by nestedness in bipartite mutualistic networks.
Group Size and Predation Risk: A Field Analysis of Encounter and Dilution Effects
  • F. Wrona
  • Environmental Science
    The American Naturalist
  • 1991
TLDR
This study shows how the separate consideration of predator-encounter and dilution effects can provide an incomplete depiction of the effectiveness of grouping as an antipredator defense and emphasizes the importance of assessing their combined, attack-abatement effect.
...
...