The Diversity of Argument-Making in the Wild: from Assumptions and Definitions to Causation and Anecdote in Reddit's "Change My View"

  title={The Diversity of Argument-Making in the Wild: from Assumptions and Definitions to Causation and Anecdote in Reddit's "Change My View"},
  author={Robin Wooyeong Na and Simon Dedeo},
What kinds of arguments do people make, and what effect do they have on others? Normative constraints on argument-making are as old as philosophy itself, but little is known about the diversity of arguments made in practice. We use NLP tools to extract patterns of argument-making from the Reddit site “Change My View” (r/CMV). This reveals six distinct argument patterns: not just the familiar deductive and inductive forms, but also arguments about definitions, relevance, possi-bility and cause… 

Tables from this paper


Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory
The hypothesis is that the function of reasoning is argumentative: It is to devise and evaluate arguments intended to persuade and is adaptive given the exceptional dependence of humans on communication and their vulnerability to misinformation.
The rise and fall of rationality in language
There has been a marked shift in public interest from the collective to the individual, and from rationality toward emotion, over the past decades, according to Google nGram data.
Argument Quality in Real World Argumentation
  • U. Hahn
  • Philosophy
    Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • 2020
Argument Mining: A Survey
The techniques that establish the foundations for argument mining are explored, a review of recent advances in argument mining techniques are provided, and the challenges faced in automatically extracting a deeper understanding of reasoning expressed in language in general are discussed.
Winning Arguments: Interaction Dynamics and Persuasion Strategies in Good-faith Online Discussions
It is shown that persuasive arguments are characterized by interesting patterns of interaction dynamics, such as participant entry-order and degree of back-and-forth exchange, and that stylistic choices in how the opinion is expressed carry predictive power.
The structure and function of explanations
  • T. Lombrozo
  • Psychology, Philosophy
    Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • 2006
Logic and Conversation
As Grice’s enthusiasm for ordinary language philosophy became increasingly qualified during the 1950s, his interest was growing in the rather different styles of philosophy of language then current
The Cognitive Science of Extremist Ideologies Online
To understand how newcomers learn ideology online, the Reddit archives of a novel sexist ideology known as the “the Red Pill” are studied, and a model of how newcomers to the group navigate the underlying conceptual structure is built.
From Probability to Consilience: How Explanatory Values Implement Bayesian Reasoning
Argument Mining
Argument mining goes one more step ahead to provide us with instant information not only about what attitudes and opinions people hold, but also about arguments which people give in favour (pro) and against (con) these attitudes and opinion.