• DOI:10.3847/1538-4357/ab536c
• Corpus ID: 207871012

The Distribution of Ultra-diffuse and Ultra-compact Galaxies in the Frontier Fields

@article{Janssens2019TheDO,
  title={The Distribution of Ultra-diffuse and Ultra-compact Galaxies in the Frontier Fields},
  author={Steven R. Janssens and Roberto G. Abraham and Jean P. Brodie and Duncan A. Forbes and Aaron J. Romanowsky},
  journal={The Astrophysical Journal},
  year={2019},
  volume={887}
}

• Steven R. Janssens, R. Abraham, +2 authors A. Romanowsky
• Published 31 October 2019
• Physics
• The Astrophysical Journal

Large low-surface-brightness galaxies have recently been found to be abundant in nearby galaxy clusters. In this paper, we investigate these ultra-diffuse galaxies (UDGs) in the six Hubble Frontier Fields galaxy clusters: A2744, MACS J0416.1−2403, MACS J0717.5+3745, MACS J1149.5+2223, AS1063, and A370. These are the most massive (1–3 × 1015 M⊙) and distant (0.308 < z < 0.545) systems in which this class of galaxy has yet been discovered. We estimate that the clusters host of the order of ∼200–1400 UDGs inside the virial radius (R200), consistent with the UDG abundance–halo-mass relation found in the local universe, and suggest that UDGs may be formed in clusters. Within each cluster, however, we find that UDGs are not evenly distributed. Instead their projected spatial distributions are lopsided, and they are deficient in the regions of highest mass density as traced by gravitational lensing. While the deficiency of UDGs in central regions is not surprising, the lopsidedness is puzzling. The UDGs, and their lopsided spatial distributions, may be associated with known substructures late in their infall into the clusters, meaning that we find evidence both for formation of UDGs in clusters and for UDGs falling into clusters. We also investigate the ultra-compact dwarfs (UCDs) residing in the clusters, and find that the spatial distributions of UDGs and UCDs appear anticorrelated. Around 15% of UDGs exhibit either compact nuclei or nearby point sources. Taken together, these observations provide additional evidence for a picture in which at least some UDGs are destroyed in dense cluster environments and leave behind a residue of UCDs.