The Development of Speciesism: Age-Related Differences in the Moral View of Animals

  title={The Development of Speciesism: Age-Related Differences in the Moral View of Animals},
  author={Luke McGuire and Sally B Palmer and Nadira Sophie Faber},
  journal={Social Psychological and Personality Science},
Humans care for the well-being of some animals (e.g., dogs) yet tacitly endorse the maltreatment of others (e.g., pigs). What treatment is deemed morally appropriate for an animal can depend on whether the animal is characterized as “food.” When such categorization of animals emerges and when a moral hierarchy of beings depending on their species membership (speciesism) develops is poorly understood. We investigate this development across samples of children (9–11 years old), young adults (18… 
3 Citations
Humans first: Why people value animals less than humans
People routinely give humans moral priority over other animals. Is such moral anthropocentrism based in perceived differences in mental capacity between humans and non-humans or merely because humans
Speciesism in everyday language.
Speciesism, like other forms of prejudice, is thought to be underpinned by biased patterns of language use. Thus far, however, psychological science has primarily focused on how speciesism is
Enabling sustainable food transitions in schools: a systemic approach
The current findings suggest that promoting healthier and more environmentally friendly food practices in schools requires systemic, integrated approaches which focus on food consumption, food provision, and the broader political and sociocultural environment.


The Moral Standing of Animals: Towards a Psychology of Speciesism
Five studies show that people morally value individuals of certain species less than others even when beliefs about intelligence and sentience are accounted for, and suggest that similar mechanisms might underlie both speciesism and other well-researched forms of prejudice.
The humanity of what we eat: Conceptions of human uniqueness among vegetarians and omnivores†
Studies on dehumanization demonstrated that denying certain human characteristics might serve as a strategy for moral disengagement. Meat consumption—especially in the times of cruel animal
Children Prioritize Humans Over Animals Less Than Adults Do
The findings suggest that the common view that humans are far more morally important than animals appears late in development and is likely socially acquired.
The Psychology of Eating Animals
Most people both eat animals and care about animals. Research has begun to examine the psychological processes that allow people to negotiate this “meat paradox.” To understand the psychology of
When Meat Gets Personal, Animals’ Minds Matter Less
Why are many Westerners outraged by dog meat, but comfortable with pork? This is particularly puzzling, given strong evidence that both species are highly intelligent. We suggest that although people
Why We Love and Exploit Animals
This unique book brings together research and theorizing on human-animal relations, animal advocacy, and the factors underlying exploitative attitudes and behaviors towards animals. Why do we both
Resolving the Meat-Paradox: A Motivational Account of Morally Troublesome Behavior and Its Maintenance
  • B. Bastian, S. Loughnan
  • Psychology
    Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc
  • 2017
It is shown how societies may be shaped by attempts to resolve dissonance, in turn protecting their citizens from discomfort associated with their own moral conflicts, and how this analysis has implications for understanding immoral behavior and motivations underpinning dehumanization and objectification.
Directly Valuing Animal Welfare in (Environmental) Economics
Research in economics is anthropocentric. It only cares about the welfare of humans, and usually does not concern itself with animals. When it does, animals are treated as resources, biodiversity, or