The Development of Delta: Using Agile to Develop a Decision Aid for Pediatric Oncology Clinical Trial Enrollment

@article{Robertson2018TheDO,
  title={The Development of Delta: Using Agile to Develop a Decision Aid for Pediatric Oncology Clinical Trial Enrollment},
  author={Eden G. Robertson and Claire E. Wakefield and Richard J. Cohn and Tracey A O'Brien and David S. Ziegler and Joanna E Fardell},
  journal={JMIR Research Protocols},
  year={2018},
  volume={7}
}
Background The internet is increasingly being used to disseminate health information. Given the complexity of pediatric oncology clinical trials, we developed Delta, a Web-based decision aid to support families deciding whether or not to enroll their child with cancer in a clinical trial. Objective This paper details the Agile development process of Delta and user testing results of Delta. Methods Development was iterative and involved 5 main stages: a requirements analysis, planning, design… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Systematic Development of Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the IPDAS Collaboration

Decision aid developers have embraced principles of user-centered design in the development of patient decision aids while also underreporting aspects of user involvement in publications about their tools.

User stories as lightweight requirements for agile clinical decision support development

User stories concisely communicate the who, what, and why of a CDS request, and serve as lightweight requirements for agile development to meet the demand for increasingly diverse CDS.

Examining Challenges to the Incorporation of End Users in the Design of Digital Health Interventions: Protocol for a Systematic Review

A systematic review to assess the challenges to incorporating end users in the design stage of digital health interventions, to identify key pain points, and to identify limitations and gaps for areas of future investigation.

What instruments should we use to assess paediatric decision-making interventions? A narrative review

A lack of consistency in the instruments used to evaluate decision-making interventions in paediatrics is revealed, making it difficult to compare interventions.

A Multicomponent eHealth Intervention for Family Carers for People Affected by Psychosis: A Coproduced Design and Build Study

The participatory research work led to the coproduction of a eHealth intervention called COPe-support (Carers fOr People with Psychosis e-support), which provides psychoeducation and psychosocial support for carers through the internet, promoting flexible access and individualized choices of information and support.

Decision-making in childhood cancer: parents’ and adolescents’ views and perceptions

It is highlighted that decision-making in pediatric oncology should focus on involving families in the deliberation phase, rather than just determination of choice, to help families feel involved in the decision process.

Piloting a parent and patient decision aid to support clinical trial decision making in childhood cancer

“Delta,” an online and booklet decision aid for parents with a child with cancer and adolescents with cancer, deciding whether or not to enrol in a clinical trial is pilot tested.

Application of Information Technology to Clinical Trial Evaluation and Enrollment: A Review.

This review summarizes cancer and noncancer studies that used IT platforms for assistance with clinical trial site selection, patient recruitment, and patient screening and found that an increasing number and variety of IT platforms were available to assist in the planning and conduct of clinical trials.

Parental decision making regarding consent to randomization on Children's Oncology Group AALL0932

This study sought to identify factors that impacted parental decision making regarding randomization on AALL0932.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 57 REFERENCES

A systematic development process for patient decision aids

A model development process is described that includes all the original elements of the original IPDAS criterion, expanded to include consideration of format and distribution plans as well as prototype development.

Assessing the Quality of Decision Support Technologies Using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi)

The existing IPDASi provides an assessment of the quality of a DST's components and will be used as a tool to provide formative advice to DSTs developers and summative assessments for those who want to compare their tools against an existing benchmark.

Strategies to facilitate shared decision-making about pediatric oncology clinical trial enrollment: A systematic review.

Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process

Criteria were given the highest ratings where evidence existed, and these were retained, and developers, users, and purchasers of patient decision aids now have a checklist for appraising quality.

What Works in Implementing Patient Decision Aids in Routine Clinical Settings? A Rapid Realist Review and Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration

Key strategies are recommended that organizations and individuals intending to embed PtDAs routinely can use as a practical guide, to understand the importance of context in the success of different implementation studies.

The Impact of Explicit Values Clarification Exercises in a Patient Decision Aid Emerges After the Decision Is Actually Made

The results suggest that the values clarification exercises led to better preparation for decision making and to less regret.

Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review

Decision Aids Can Support Cancer Clinical Trials Decisions: Results of a Randomized Trial.

Improvements on key decision outcomes including knowledge, self-efficacy, certainty about choice, and values clarity among participants who viewed the DA suggest web-based DAs can support informed decisions about trial participation among cancer patients facing this preference-sensitive choice.

End-of-Life Decision Making by Adolescents, Parents, and Healthcare Providers in Pediatric Oncology: RESEARCH TO EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE GUIDELINES

The agreement across studies regarding influencing factors provides the basis for the research-based guidelines for end-of-life decision making in pediatric oncology, which offer assistance in a structured manner that can be formally evaluated and individualized to meet patient and family needs.

The think aloud method: a guide to user interface design

...