The Development and Validation of a New Machiavellianism Scale

@article{Dahling2009TheDA,
  title={The Development and Validation of a New Machiavellianism Scale},
  author={Jason J Dahling and Brian G. Whitaker and Paul E. Levy},
  journal={Journal of Management},
  year={2009},
  volume={35},
  pages={219 - 257}
}
A new measure of Machiavellianism, the Machiavellian Personality Scale (MPS), was developed and validated over two studies. Machiavellianism is conceptualized as one's propensity to distrust others, engage in amoral manipulation, seek control over others, and seek status for oneself. Study 1 developed and tested the factor structure of the scale, whereas Study 2 provided evidence for the convergent, divergent, and criterion-related validity of the MPS. The results of these studies supported the… 
Does Machiavellianism meaningfully differ from psychopathy? It depends.
TLDR
Evaluating the super-short form of the Five Factor Machiavellianism Inventory (FFMI-SSF) in relation to psychopathy and basic personality traits and to compare it to widely used measures of the DT and psychopathy in a large undergraduate sample.
An Other Perspective on Five Factor Machiavellianism
TLDR
In a sample of 425 target-coworker dyads, it is found that the traditional measures of MACH show a high degree of similarity with psychopathy, while the FFMI is discriminant from psychopathy and shows divergence from traditional measures from MACH with reference to coworker ratings of social competencies, vocational environments, and occupational success.
Five Factor Machiavellianism: Validation of a New Measure
TLDR
The FFMI displayed positive relations with a broad range of criteria for vocational and work-related success and was clearly distinct from psychopathy, which converged greatly with the correlation profiles for the FFMI-antagonism dimension.
A PREDICTIVE MODEL OF SHADENFREUDE, A MACHIAVELLIANISM FACET
Scientific literature on the dark triad and antisocial behavior has recently attracted the interest of researchers to effectively understand the complexities of human aggressiveness. In addition,
Compete and Compromise: Machiavellianism and Conflict Resolution
The aim of our present study was to examine Machiavellians’ conflict management styles that have been neglected in previous research. One hundred eighty three participants completed the
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 169 REFERENCES
Factor analysis of the Machiavellian Scale
The paper is a report of a factor analytical study of the Christie and Gies Machiavellian Scale. Subjects were 122 part-time and full-time students from Laurentian University, Canada. Principal
Machiavellianism and ingratiation.
Summary The main objective of this paper was to demonstrate the role of the personality variable Machiavellianism and of the situational variable competition vs. noncompetition on the adoption of
Machiavellian beliefs and social influence
Previous work (Hunter, Gerbing & Boster, 1982) determined that the MACH IV scale is not a unidimensional construct of Machiavellianism, but rather reflects a set of four beliefs about human nature:
The meaning and measurement of Machiavellianism in Chinese and American college students.
TLDR
It was concluded that researchers must exercise considerable care in cross-cultural personality research, since constructs of Machiavellianism may not have similar meanings when applied to non-Western groups.
On Measurement of Machiavellianism
Recently. Bloom ( 1 ) and Shea and Beatty ( 5 ) have debated the reliability of the Mach V scale ( 2 ) , a popular instrument used to measure interpersonal manipulation. Shea and Beatty's main
Machiavellianism: An alexithymic perspective
Abstract The volitional model of Machiavellianism emphasizes that the Machiavellian person chooses to be manipulative. The model is critiqued. An alternative model is proposed, which asserts that the
Comparison of four jealousy scales
Machiavellianism: A Preliminary Review
In this review articles bearing upon Machiavellianism are considered in the light of the theory postulated by Christie and Geis (1970). Generally this theory is supported by the results of the
Socioeconomic achievement and the Machiavellian personality.
To test the hypothesis that education moderates the relationship between interpersonal manipulativeness ("Machiavellianism") and social attainment, data from a national sample (N = 1482) were
...
...