• DOI:10.1348/014466503321903544
• Corpus ID: 12632651

The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS): normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample.

@article{Crawford2003TheDA,
  title={The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS): normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample.},
  author={John R. Crawford and Julie D. Henry},
  journal={The British journal of clinical psychology},
  year={2003},
  volume={42 Pt 2},
  pages={
          111-31
        }
}

• J. Crawford, J. Henry
• Published 1 June 2003
• Psychology
• The British journal of clinical psychology

OBJECTIVES
To provide UK normative data for the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) and test its convergent, discriminant and construct validity.

DESIGN
Cross-sectional, correlational and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

METHODS
The DASS was administered to a non-clinical sample, broadly representative of the general adult UK population (N = 1,771) in terms of demographic variables. Competing models of the latent structure of the DASS were derived from theoretical and empirical sources and evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis. Correlational analysis was used to determine the influence of demographic variables on DASS scores. The convergent and discriminant validity of the measure was examined through correlating the measure with two other measures of depression and anxiety (the HADS and the sAD), and a measure of positive and negative affectivity (the PANAS).

RESULTS
The best fitting model (CFI =.93) of the latent structure of the DASS consisted of three correlated factors corresponding to the depression, anxiety and stress scales with correlated error permitted between items comprising the DASS subscales. Demographic variables had only very modest influences on DASS scores. The reliability of the DASS was excellent, and the measure possessed adequate convergent and discriminant validity Conclusions: The DASS is a reliable and valid measure of the constructs it was intended to assess. The utility of this measure for UK clinicians is enhanced by the provision of large sample normative data.