The Decision to Partition Bengal in 1905

@article{Mclane1965TheDT,
  title={The Decision to Partition Bengal in 1905},
  author={J. Mclane},
  journal={Indian Economic And Social History Review},
  year={1965},
  volume={2},
  pages={221 - 237}
}
  • J. Mclane
  • Published 1965
  • Sociology
  • Indian Economic And Social History Review
  • THE partition of Bengal in 1905 represents a divide in Indian history for several reasons. First, it aroused Hindu-Muslim antagonisms. Before 1905, Hindu-Muslim hostility was not usually considered to be a major feature of Indian political life. The potential for trouble existed, especially in those areas where the Hindus had a disproportionate share of economic, educational, and administrative opportunities, as in Bengal and the Punjab, and where the Muslims had outstripped the Hindus, as in… CONTINUE READING

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 28 REFERENCES
    BNNR, No. 31, para. 26) said that the separation of Bihar, Chota Nagpur and Orissa "would have met with no opposition." This was an overstatement
    • 1905
    Com
    • 1896
    Cotton’s Presidential Address, Report of the 20th I.N.C
    • 1905
    East India (Reconstitution of the Provinces of Bengal and Assam) Further Papers, No. 2. 60. W. C. MacPherson
      East India (Reconstruction of the Provinces of Bengal and Assam)
      • 1905
      Fuller's Confidential Note, enclosure to Fuller to
        Note by Curzon on the Place of Berar in the Administration System of British India
          Report of the 20th I.N.C. (1904), p. 45; also, Cotton's speech
            Report on the Agitation Against the Partition of Bengal, para
            • 1906