The Darwinian Revolution, as seen in 1979 and as seen Twenty-Five Years Later in 2004

@article{Ruse2005TheDR,
  title={The Darwinian Revolution, as seen in 1979 and as seen Twenty-Five Years Later in 2004},
  author={Michael Ruse},
  journal={Journal of the History of Biology},
  year={2005},
  volume={38},
  pages={3-17}
}
  • M. Ruse
  • Published 1 March 2005
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Journal of the History of Biology
My book, The Darwinian Revolution gives an overview of the revolution as understood at the time of its writing (1979). It shows that many factors were involved, from straight science through philosophical methodology, and on to religious influences and challenges. Also of importance were social factors, not the least of which was the professionalization of science in Britain in the 19th century. Since the appearance of that book, new, significant factors have become apparent, and here I discuss… 
Darwin’s Breakthrough
In the eyes of the young Charles Darwin, the traditional fixist, essentialist and teleological framework had found itself in an increasingly deep crisis since the end of the eighteenth century. In
The Compatibility of Science and Religion: Why the Warfare Thesis Is False
In the second half of the nineteenth century, a good number of scientists — prominent among whom was Darwin’s great supporter Thomas Henry Huxley — subscribed to what is known as the ‘warfare’ thesis
Interpreting the History of Evolutionary Biology through a Kuhnian Prism: Sense or Nonsense?
Traditionally, Thomas S. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962) is largely identified with his analysis of the structure of scientific revolutions. Here, we contribute to a minority
Darwinian Struggles: But is There Progress?
At the heart of Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution is the struggle for existence. Organisms are in ongoing conflict as they strive for food, space, and reproductive opportunities. It is from this
Darwinism Then and Now: The Divide Over Form and Function
As biologists have recognized since Aristotle, there are two complementary ways of looking at organisms: one can think of them from the viewpoint of homology, asking about the isomorphisms between
El “darwinismo puro” de Alfred Russel Wallace: aportaciones a la teoría evolutiva moderna
History tends to insist on remembering the case of Alfred Russel Wallace as one who, secondarily, supported Darwin’s proposal. For the purposes of this work it is presented what Wallace called in his
Laws, Models, and Theories in Biology: A Unifying Interpretation
Three metascientific concepts that have been the object of philosophical analysis are the concepts of law, model, and theory. The aim of this chapter is to present the explication of these concepts
The Quasicrystals Discovery as a Resonance of the Non-Euclidean Geometry Revolution: Historical and Philosophical Perspective
In this paper, we review the history of quasicrystals from their sensational discovery in 1982, initially “forbidden” by the rules of classical crystallography, to 2011 when Dan Shechtman was awarded
Rescuing tracking theories of morality
Abstract Street’s (Philos Stud 127(1):109–166, 2006) Darwinian Dilemma purports to show that evolutionary considerations are in tension with realist theories of value, which include moral realism.
MULTIPLE DARWINS – ON THE MYTH-PRODUCING RECEPTION OF A NATURAL HISTORIAN
A tanulmany celja A fajok eredete megjelenesenek 150. es Darwin szuletesenek 200. evforduloja kapcsan vizsgalni az evfordulok es megemlekezesek hatasat a tudosokkal kapcsolatos mitoszok
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 30 REFERENCES
Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution
In her enduring study of the impact of Darwinism on the intellectual climate of the nineteenth century, Gertrude Himmelfarb brings massive documentation to bear in challenging the conventional view
Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior
TLDR
Robert J. Richards contends that Darwin, Herbert Spencer, and their disciples attempted to reanimate moral life, believing that the evolutionary process gave heart to unselfish, altruistic behavior.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
A good book may have the power to change the way we see the world, but a great book actually becomes part of our daily consciousness, pervading our thinking to the point that we take it for granted,
Are Evolutionists Still Hooked on Progress?@@@Monad to Man: The Concept of Progress in Evolutionary Biology.
TLDR
His book traces the line between those who argue that science is and must be objective and those who deem science a "social construction" in the fashion of religion or the rest of culture, at a time when its status as science is under greater scrutiny than ever before.
The Evolution-Creation Struggle
Creation versus evolution: What seems like a cultural crisis of our day, played out in courtrooms and classrooms across the county, is in fact part of a larger story reaching back through the
The Politics of Evolution: Morphology, Medicine, and Reform in Radical London
Looking for the first time at the cut-price anatomy schools rather than genteel Oxbridge, Desmond winkles out pre- Darwinian evolutionary ideas in reform-minded and politically charged early
Darwin and design : does evolution have a purpose?
The intricate forms of living things bespeak design, and thus a creator: nearly 150 years after Darwin's theory of natural selection called this argument into question, we still speak of life in
Darwinism and its discontents
cause, and therefore that the mere existence of controversies among Darwinians throws doubt on the phenomenon of evolution itself. Commendably, Ruse’s aim in this book is to wise up the public.
Mystery of Mysteries: Is Evolution a Social Construction?
With the Sokal hoax - the publication of a prominent physicist's pseudo-article in a leading journal of cultural studies - the status of science moved sharply from debate to dispute. Is science
Michael Ruse's Design for Living
TLDR
The eminent historian and philosopher ofbiology, Michael Ruse, proves he is a thinker to contend with, and this essay is quite contentious.
...
1
2
3
...