The Contextual Determinants of Support for Unilateral Action

@article{Reeves2017TheCD,
  title={The Contextual Determinants of Support for Unilateral Action},
  author={Andrew Reeves and Jon C. Rogowski and Min Hee Seo and Andrew R. Stone},
  journal={Presidential Studies Quarterly},
  year={2017},
  volume={47},
  pages={448-470}
}
Recent scholarship shows relatively low public approval for the president’s use of unilateral powers, yet public attitudes are often susceptible to framing effects. We conduct a series of survey experiments to explore attitudes toward unilateral power while varying a range of contextual features, including the identity of the president, the unilateral tool used, the justification for the action, and the policy pursued. We find little evidence that context affects attitudes toward unilateral… 

Figures from this paper

Partisan Context and Procedural Values: Attitudes Towards Presidential Secrecy Before and after the 2016 US Election

What shapes attitudes towards procedural rules that constrain executive power? This letter argues that procedural values are contextual: A function of who is in power. Supporters of those in power

Public attitudes toward presidential veto powers

Previous research on presidential powers has demonstrated predictable variation in the level of support for presidential usage of those powers. However, much of this work has focused solely on

Media Attention and Strategic Timing in Politics: Evidence from U.S. Presidential Executive Orders

Do politicians tend to adopt unpopular policies when the media and the public are distracted by other events? We examine this question by analyzing the timing of the signing of executive orders (EOs)

Policymaking by the Executive: Examining the Fate of Presidential Agenda Items

Abstract Politicians routinely campaign on a large platform of new policies and policy changes they hope to pursue once in office. Presidents, however, are unique in their ability to accomplish this

Presidents’ Vetoes and Audience Costs

Veto threats may offer presidents bargaining leverage, but such leverage will be diminished if they and those with whom they transact business view a veto as hurting the president’s approval rating

Pass the buck or the buck stops here? The public costs of claiming and deflecting blame in managing crises

Abstract When things go wrong, and the government may be to blame, the public support enjoyed by elected executives is vulnerable. Because attribution of responsibility is often not straightforward,

Human rights institutionalization and US humanitarian military intervention

ABSTRACT Are human rights a core value of US foreign policy? If so, how does the United States enforce human rights standards? Extant studies maintain that mass media, public opinion, and/or

Antipartyism and Public Opinion toward Presidential Unilateral Actions: The Case of Taiwan in 2017

In this article, we examine how antipartyism influences the public’s preferences for the tools of presidential power by focusing on the case of Taiwan, which is a president-parliamentary system. We

Attitudes Toward Delegation to Presidential Commissions

We examine attitudes of the pubic toward delegation to presidential commissions. In four survey experiments across a range of contexts, we compare the public response to the creation of a commission

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 53 REFERENCES

Constitutional Qualms or Politics as Usual? The Factors Shaping Public Support for Unilateral Action

The formal institutional constraints that Congress and the courts impose on presidential unilateral action are feeble. As a result, recent scholarship suggests that public opinion may be the

Unilateral Powers, Public Opinion, and the Presidency

This article explores mass attitudes toward unilateral presidential power. We argue that mass attitudes toward presidential power reflect evaluations of the current president as well as more

Public Perception of the Presidential Toolkit

Studies of unilateral power typically analyze a single tool of presidential action (e.g., executive orders, memoranda, proclamations, and signing statements) in relative isolation. But scholars have

Political Constraints on Unilateral Executive Action

Pundits, politicians, and scholars alike have decried the dramatic expansion of presidential unilateral power in recent decades. Such brazen assertions, against which Congress and the courts have

Americans’ Attitudes About the Senate Filibuster

We examine public attitudes about one of the most visible procedural features of Congress, the Senate’s filibuster and cloture practice. We measure the stability of those attitudes during an

The Public Presidency, Personal Approval Ratings, and Policy Making

In this article, I argue that personal popularity is less essential to how a president's public activities affect policy making than commonly presumed, and provide two types of evidence for this

Issue Framing and Public Opinion on Government Spending

The issue of government spending provides an interesting context for testing issue-framing effects in American public opinion. Competing partisan elites clearly portray the spending issue in

Power without Persuasion: The Politics of Direct Presidential Action

Since the early 1960s, scholarly thinking on the power of U.S. presidents has rested on these words: "Presidential power is the power to persuade." Power, in this formulation, is strictly about

Value choices and American public opinion

Individual preferences among core values are widely believed to be an important determinant of political attitudes. However, several theoretical perspectives suggest that people experience

The Presidential Power of Unilateral Action

In this article we highlight a formal basis for presidential power that has gone largely unappreciated to this point, but has become so pivotal to presidential leadership and so central to an
...