The Constitution in the Supreme Court: Contracts and Commerce, 1836-1864

@article{Currie1983TheCI,
  title={The Constitution in the Supreme Court: Contracts and Commerce, 1836-1864},
  author={David P. Currie},
  journal={Duke Law Journal},
  year={1983},
  volume={1983},
  pages={471-513}
}

On the 100th Anniversary of Lochner v. New York

In 2005, the Supreme Court decided Lochner v. New York, striking down a maximum hour law as violating the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court's ruling in Lochner gave enhanced

Marbury v. Madison: How John Marshall Changed History by Misquoting the Constitution

  • W. H. Rose
  • Education
    PS: Political Science & Politics
  • 2003
I t goes without saying that Marbury v. Madison (5 U.S. 137 [1803]) is the single most important decision of the United States Supreme Court and, with its bicentennial at hand, that conclusion will,

Translating Federalism: United States v Lopez

I have hardly ever met one of the common people in America who did not surprisingly and easily perceive which obligations derived from a law of Congress and which were based on the laws of his state

References

SHOWING 1-7 OF 7 REFERENCES

Campbell once again properly found it unnecessary to decide the broader question

    ) 122 (1819)). Taney persuasively explained that the arguably contrary naturalization decision of Chirac v

      License Cases, 46 U.S. (5 How.) at 618, 624. Nelson had replaced Thompson in 1845

        See general, 6 C. FAIRMAN, HIS-TORY OF THE-SuPREME COURT OF THE UNrED STATEs

          Msupra note 3

            HeinOnline --1983 Duke L

            • J

            Contributors to Pennsylvania Hospital v

            • 1917