The Consequences of the Hindsight Bias in Medical Decision Making

  title={The Consequences of the Hindsight Bias in Medical Decision Making},
  author={Hal R. Arkes},
  journal={Current Directions in Psychological Science},
  pages={356 - 360}
  • H. Arkes
  • Published 25 September 2013
  • Psychology
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science
The hindsight bias manifests in the tendency to exaggerate the extent to which a past event could have been predicted beforehand. This bias has particularly detrimental effects in the domain of medical decision making. I present a demonstration of the bias, its contribution to overconfidence, and its involvement in judgments of medical malpractice. Finally, I point out that physicians and psychologists can collaborate to the mutual benefit of both professions. 

Figures from this paper

Errors/Biases in Clinical Decision Making
Clinicians are subject to the same errors in thinking that affect virtually all people. In particular, practitioners must be wary of (a) the misuse of certain heuristics (e.g., availability,
Hindsight Bias in Depression
People tend to be biased by outcome knowledge when looking back on events. This phenomenon is known as hindsight bias. Clinical intuition and theoretical accounts of affect-regulatory functions of
Looking Backward and Forward on Hindsight Bias
The same event that appeared unpredictable in foresight can be judged as predictable in hindsight. Hindsight bias clouds judgments in all areas of life, including legal decisions, medical diagnoses,
Age Differences in Hindsight Bias: A Meta-Analysis
Overall, older adults were less likely to recollect their original judgment than young adults, and thus had to reconstruct it more frequently, and the magnitude of bias in the reconstructed judgments was slightly larger in older than in young adults.
Recognizing and reducing cognitive bias in clinical and forensic neurology
4 common biases that can lead the clinician astray are discussed: confirmation bias (selective gathering of and neglect of contradictory evidence); base rate bias (ignoring or misusing prevailing base rate data); hindsight bias (oversimplification of past causation); and good old days bias (the tendency for patients to misremember and exaggerate their preinjury functioning).
Hindsight bias critically impacts on clinicians’ assessment of care quality in retrospective case note review
Hindsight bias combined with a legal duty of candour will cause families to be informed that patients died because of healthcare error when this is not a fact, and in some cases, clinicians are markedly more critical of identical healthcare when a patients dies compared to when a patient survives.
Age Differences in Processes Underlying Hindsight Bias: A Life-Span Study
ABSTRACT Hindsight bias is the tendency to overestimate one’s prior knowledge of a fact or event after learning the actual fact. Recent research has suggested that age-related differences in
Medical Negligence Determinations, the “Right to Try,” and Expanded Access to Innovative Treatments
  • D. Meyerson
  • Law, Political Science
    Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
  • 2017
The issue of expanded access to innovative treatments in the context of recent legislative initiatives in the United Kingdom and the United States has a cogent rationale in so far as they highlight the need for rights-based reform to federal regulations governing access.


The Influence of a Physician's Use of a Diagnostic Decision Aid on the Malpractice Verdicts of Mock Jurors
  • H. Arkes, V. Shaffer, M. Medow
  • Medicine
    Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
  • 2008
Use of a diagnostic decision aid did not influence the likelihood of an adverse malpractice verdict andplying with the aid's recommendation provided a measure of protection against jurors' punitiveness for those physicians deemed liable for malpractice.
Eliminating the hindsight bias.
Those who consider the likelihood of an event after it has occurred exaggerate their likelihood of having been able to predict that event in advance. We attempted to eliminate this hindsight bias
On the Psychology of Experimental Surprises.
Studies of the psychology of hindsight have shown that reporting the outcome of a historical event increases the perceived likelihood of that outcome. Three experiments show that similar hindsight
Hindsight Bias: An Impediment to Accurate Probability Estimation in Clinicopathologic Conferences
Evidence for the presence of the hindsight bias was sought among 160 physicians and trainees attending four CPCs and less experienced physicians consistently demonstrated the hindsight biases, while more experienced physicians succumbed only on easier cases.
Clinical versus actuarial judgment.
Research comparing these two approaches to decision-making shows the actuarial method to be superior, factors underlying the greater accuracy of actuarial methods, sources of resistance to the scientific findings, and the benefits of increased reliance on actuarial approaches are discussed.
Considering the opposite: a corrective strategy for social judgment.
In two separate but conceptually parallel experiments, the induction of a consider-the-opposite strategy had greater corrective effect than more demand-laden alternative instructions to be as fair and unbiased as possible.
Reasons for confidence.
People are often overconfident in evaluating the correctness of their knowledge. The present studies investigated the possibility that assessment of confidence is biased by attempts to justify one's
How to Reduce the Effect of Framing on Messages About Health
Although low‐numeracy people are more susceptible to framing than those with high numeracy, use of visual aids is an effective method to eliminate its effects and not all visual aids were equally effective.
Decisions from Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice
This work found that in the case of decisions from experience, people make choices as if they underweight the probability of rare events, and explored the impact of two possible causes of this underweighting—reliance on relatively small samples of information and overweighting of recently sampled information.
Nurses' risk assessment judgements: a confidence calibration study.
Nurses were systematically biased towards over/under-confidence in their critical event risk assessment judgements and were no better calibrated than their student counterparts; with student under-confidence countered by experienced nurses' greater susceptibility to over-confidence.