The Conflict of Evidence and Coherence

@article{Worsnip2018TheCO,
  title={The Conflict of Evidence and Coherence},
  author={Alex Worsnip},
  journal={Philosophy and Phenomenological Research},
  year={2018},
  volume={96},
  pages={3-44}
}
  • Alex Worsnip
  • Published 2018
  • Psychology
  • Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
For many epistemologists, and for many philosophers more broadly, it is axiomatic that rationality requires you to take the doxastic attitudes that your evidence supports. Yet there is also another current in our talk about rationality. On this usage, rationality is a matter of the right kind of coherence between one's mental attitudes. Surprisingly little work in epistemology is explicitly devoted to answering the question of how these two currents of talk are related. But many implicitly… Expand
70 Citations
Anti-Exceptionalism About Requirements of Epistemic Rationality
  • PDF
EVIDENCE, COHERENCE AND EPISTEMIC AKRASIA
  • 2
  • Highly Influenced
Isolating Correct Reasoning
  • 3
  • PDF
Higher-Order Defeat and Evincibility
  • PDF
Belief, Credence, and the Preface Paradox
  • 14
Higher-order defeat and intellectual responsibility
  • Ru Ye
  • Philosophy, Computer Science
  • Synthese
  • 2018
  • 1
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 33 REFERENCES
...
1
2
3
4
...