The Cognitive Science of Spreadsheet Errors: Why Thinking is Bad

@article{Panko2013TheCS,
  title={The Cognitive Science of Spreadsheet Errors: Why Thinking is Bad},
  author={R. Panko},
  journal={2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences},
  year={2013},
  pages={4013-4022}
}
  • R. Panko
  • Published 2013
  • Computer Science
  • 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
Research has long shown that spreadsheet developers are 96% to 99% accurate when they enter information into spreadsheet cells. For large spreadsheets, unfortunately, a cell error rate of 1% to 6% will almost certainly lead to incorrect results. Can cell error rates (CERs) really be this high? General human error research has shown that when humans do simple but nontrivial cognitive tasks, they inevitably have comparable error rates. The problem is that human cognitive mechanisms have evolved… Expand
Are We Overconfident in Our Understanding of Overconfidence ?
Thinking Fast and Slow in Computer Problem Solving
Sprego, End-user Programming in Spreadsheets
The Dunning-Kruger Effect in a workplace computing setting
Edu-Edition Spreadsheet Competency Framework
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 45 REFERENCES
A critical review of the literature on spreadsheet errors
The Many Uses of Error
Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate?
The Invisible Gorilla: And Other Ways Our Intuitions Deceive Us
Spreadsheets and Sarbanes-Oxley: Regulations, Risks, and Control Frameworks
  • R. Panko
  • Engineering, Computer Science
  • Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst.
  • 2006
Revising the Panko-Halverson taxonomy of spreadsheet errors
How Spreadsheets Get Us to Mars and Beyond
How Spreadsheets Get Us to Mars and Beyond
A New Ideomotor Theory of Voluntary Control
...
1
2
3
4
5
...