The Cognitive Basis of Trait Anger and Reactive Aggression: An Integrative Analysis

@article{Wilkowski2008TheCB,
  title={The Cognitive Basis of Trait Anger and Reactive Aggression: An Integrative Analysis},
  author={Benjamin M. Wilkowski and Michael D. Robinson},
  journal={Personality and Social Psychology Review},
  year={2008},
  volume={12},
  pages={21 - 3}
}
Cognitive processing approaches to personality have gained momentum in recent years, and the present review uses such a cognitive approach to understand individual differences in anger and reactive aggression. Because several relevant cognitive models have been proposed in separate literatures, a purpose of this review is to integrate such material and evaluate the consistency of relations obtained to date. The analysis reveals that processes related to automatic hostile interpretations… 

Figures from this paper

Personality processes in anger and reactive aggression: an introduction.
TLDR
The utility of this individual difference realm in understanding wider personality processes related to social cognition, reactivity, and self-regulation is highlighted and a brief case for broader process-related conclusions that are generally apparent is made.
The anatomy of anger: an integrative cognitive model of trait anger and reactive aggression.
TLDR
It is proposed that low trait anger individuals use effortful control resources to self-regulate the influence of their hostile thoughts, whereas those high in trait anger do not.
Guarding against hostile thoughts: trait anger and the recruitment of cognitive control.
TLDR
The convergence of findings across studies provides one likely mechanism for the reduced levels of reactivity at low levels of trait anger.
How does cognitive control reduce anger and aggression? The role of conflict monitoring and forgiveness processes.
TLDR
The authors propose that limited capacity resources can be recruited within a hostile situation to promote a process of forgiveness and the results contribute to a systematic understanding of how cognitive control leads to lower levels of anger and aggression.
Associative and spontaneous appraisal processes independently contribute to anger elicitation in daily life.
TLDR
Results support a model that acknowledges the role of both associative and appraisal processes in anger elicitation, and this relationship proved to be independent of daily hostile interpretations.
Transdiagnostic cognitive processes in high trait anger.
The Multiple Systems Model of Angry Rumination
  • T. Denson
  • Psychology
    Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc
  • 2013
TLDR
A functional account of angry rumination is suggested, gaps in knowledge are identified, and future research directions based on hypotheses derived from the model are proposed.
Reducing the Tendency to Aggress: Insights from Social and Personality Psychology
The social and personality psychology literature on aggression has largely focused on the factors that are associated with an increase in aggression such as provocation, violent media exposure, and
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 211 REFERENCES
Examining an Affective Aggression Framework Weapon and Temperature Effects on Aggressive Thoughts, Affect, and Attitudes
A general framework for studying affective aggression, integrating many insights from previous models (e.g., those of Baron, Berkowitz, Geen, and Zillmann), is presented. New research examining
On the formation and regulation of anger and aggression. A cognitive-neoassociationistic analysis.
TLDR
A cognitive-neoassociationistic model is proposed to account for the effects of negative affect on the development of angry feelings and the display of emotional aggression and it is argued that the model can integrate the core aspect of the James-Lange theory with the newer cognitive theories of emotion.
Keeping One's Cool: Trait Anger, Hostile Thoughts, and the Recruitment of Limited Capacity Control
TLDR
All studies converge on the link between low trait anger and the spontaneous recruitment of limited-capacity cognitive control resources following hostile primes.
Effect of Trait Anger on Cognitive Processing of Emotional Stimuli
TLDR
Results indicated that individuals who reported high levels of trait anger displayed facilitative biases in the processing of semantic anger-related stimuli, which may underlie their propensity to experience intense feelings of anger when provoked.
Human aggression.
TLDR
Using the general aggression model (GAM), this review posits cognition, affect, and arousal to mediate the effects of situational and personological variables on aggression.
A meta‐analytic review of help giving and aggression from an attributional perspective: Contributions to a general theory of motivation
The present review syntheses 64 investigations on the determinants of helping and aggression involving more than 12,000 subjects, providing empirical tests of Weiner's (1986, 1995) theory of social
Neurocognitive models of aggression, the antisocial personality disorders, and psychopathy
  • R. Blair
  • Psychology
    Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry
  • 2001
TLDR
Impairments in executive emotional systems are related to reactive aggression shown by patients with “acquired sociopathy” due to orbitofrontal cortex lesions and the capacity to form associations between emotional unconditioned stimuli, particularly distress cues, and conditioned stimuli.
Toward an understanding of the determinants of anger.
TLDR
The authors urge emotion theorists to widen their methodology and analyses so that they give careful, detailed attention to the many different factors that can influence anger.
From Antecedent Conditions to Violent Actions: A General Affective Aggression Model
The General Affective Aggression Model (GAAM) posits that variables that increase aggression do so by increasing aggressive affect, aggressive cognition, or arousal. The effects of trait hostility,
...
1
2
3
4
5
...