The Chrysalis Effect

@article{OBoyle2017TheCE,
  title={The Chrysalis Effect},
  author={Ernest H O'Boyle and G. Banks and Erik Gonzalez-Mul{\'e}},
  journal={Journal of Management},
  year={2017},
  volume={43},
  pages={376 - 399}
}
The issue of a published literature not representative of the population of research is most often discussed in terms of entire studies being suppressed. However, alternative sources of publication bias are questionable research practices (QRPs) that entail post hoc alterations of hypotheses to support data or post hoc alterations of data to support hypotheses. Using general strain theory as an explanatory framework, we outline the means, motives, and opportunities for researchers to better… Expand
The Harm Done to Reproducibility by the Culture of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing.
  • T. Lash
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • American journal of epidemiology
  • 2017
Commentary: Perverse Incentives or Rotten Apples?
  • L. Bouter
  • Sociology, Medicine
  • Accountability in research
  • 2015
What Crisis? Management Researchers’ Experiences with and Views of Scholarly Misconduct
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 115 REFERENCES
Publication Bias in Empirical Sociological Research
Why We Need Industrial–Organizational Psychology to Fix Industrial–Organizational Psychology
Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data
Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
  • D. Fanelli
  • Sociology, Computer Science
  • Scientometrics
  • 2011
How Can Significance Tests Be Deinstitutionalized?
How Trustworthy Is the Scientific Literature in Industrial and Organizational Psychology?
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences
...
1
2
3
4
5
...