The Chicago School of Anti-Monopolistic Competition: Stigler’s Scorched Earth Campaign Against Chamberlin

  title={The Chicago School of Anti-Monopolistic Competition: Stigler’s Scorched Earth Campaign Against Chamberlin},
  author={Craig F Freedman},
George Stigler did not think much of case studies, the 1950s Harvard approach to industrial organization. “Each new PhD gravely decided in some mysterious fashion whether the industry chosen for his doctoral dissertation was or was not acting in a socially desirable way” (Stigler 1988a: 162). So perhaps he would have been amused or annoyed that his campaign to destroy the idea of monopolistic competition serves as an illustration of how marketing and ideological demands intertwine to shape… 
4 Citations

George Stigler: Marshall’s Loyal but Faithless Follower

George Stigler judged Alfred Marshall to be almost incomparably superior to his immediate predecessors and contemporaries. However, despite being a loyal defender of Marshall’s intellectual heritage,

Analysis of the Effect of Unemployment on the Economic Growth of Nigeria

This paper sought to estimate the impact of unemployment on the economic growth in Nigeria, using time series data from 1999 to 2017. The data used were sourced from the Central Bank of Nigeria



The Chicago Counter-Revolution and The Sociology of Economic Knowledge

George Stigler and Milton Friedman sought, and achieved, great influence both internally (within the economics profession) and externally (over a wider constituency).2 The intellectual and policy

George J. Stigler: Midcentury Neoclassicalist with a Passion to Quantify

  • H. Demsetz
  • Economics, History
    Journal of Political Economy
  • 1993
It is convenient that a field of study not exist before one begins a body of work that helps to create it, and industrial organization did not exist in 1938 when George Stigler received his doctorate

The Economist as Mythmaker- Stigler's Kinky Transformation

Economists can so dislike the conclusions of an article, or what they perceive to be the conclusions, that they comb through the article with the sole hope of refuting its logic. If these ungentle

Chamberlin versus Chicago

In the last few years we have had something of a revolution in methodology, and the economists who have advocated the ‘new methodology’ have found that it gives them a powerful position from which to


Textbooks on economic theory often evoke mixed reactions, because among them there are the good, the bad, and the ugly. At any rate ‘‘textbooks . . . cannot be cavalierly dismissed as the simple

The Economists and the Problem of Monopoly

For much too long a time, students of the history of the American antitrust policy have been at least mildly perplexed by the coolness with which American economists greeted the Sherman Act. Was not

Production and Distribution Theories

Production and Distribution Theories became a landmark in the study of economics when it was published in 1941. Nobel Laureate Stigler's book was the first to trace the development of theories

Law or Economics?

  • G. Stigler
  • Economics
    The Journal of Law and Economics
  • 1992
W HEN Aaron Director and Edward Levi launched the Journal of Law and Economics in 1958, Director suggested the title Law or Economics. This alternative title certainly described the world more

The Passing of the Guard in Economics

This is a lucky audience. When I accepted the invitation to give the present lecture, my first temptation was to choose for a topic A Sweeping New Non-Substitution Theorem Valid for Technologies

The Genesis of 'Positive Economics' and the Rejection of Monopolistic Competition Theory: A Methodological Debate

In 'The Methodology of Positive Economics' (1953), Milton Friedman linked the adoption of a falsificationist methodology to the rejection of monopolistic competition as a valid assumption, thus