The Changing Landscape of Open Access Publishing: Can Open Access Publishing Make the Scholarly World More Equitable and Productive?

@article{Dudley2021TheCL,
  title={The Changing Landscape of Open Access Publishing: Can Open Access Publishing Make the Scholarly World More Equitable and Productive?},
  author={Richard G. Dudley},
  journal={Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication},
  year={2021},
  volume={9},
  pages={2345}
}
  • R. Dudley
  • Published 21 February 2021
  • Economics
  • Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication
Almost 50% of scholarly articles are now open access in some form. This greatly benefits scholars at most institutions and is especially helpful to independent scholars and those without access to libraries. It also furthers the long-standing idea of knowledge as a public good. The changing dynamics of open access (OA) threaten this positive development by solidifying the pay-to-publish OA model which further marginalizes peripheral scholars and incentivizes the development of  sub-standard and… 
1 Citations

Figures from this paper

Did You Ask for Citations? An Insight into Preprint Citations en route to Open Science
Preprints are regularly cited in peer reviewed journal articles, books and conference paper. Are preprint citations somehow less important than citations to peer reviewed research papers? This study

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 72 REFERENCES
Make Open Access Publishing Fair and Transparent
The scientific publication landscape has dramatically changed in environmental sciences (and beyond) since the onset of this millennium by two closely interconnected trends: the widespread emergence
In pursuit of open science, open access is not enough
TLDR
Of particular concern for the academic community, as subscription revenues decline in the transition to OA and some publishers prioritize other sources of revenue, is the growing ownership of data analytics, hosting, and portal services by large scholarly publishers.
Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact?
Although many authors believe that their work has a greater research impact if it is freely available, studies to demonstrate that impact are few. This study looks at articles in four disciplines at
Open access to scientific articles: a review of benefits and challenges
  • B. Björk
  • Medicine
    Internal and Emergency Medicine
  • 2017
TLDR
The different options to achieve Open Access, whether by journals changing their revenue structures from subscription to publishing charges, or authors utilizing a number of options for posting OA versions of article manuscripts in repositories are reviewed.
How can existing open access models work for humanities and social science research
TLDR
The launch of the Open Library of Humanities in early 2013 and its growing momentum as a scholarly-led movement over the last 12 months demonstrates that there is an increasing awareness amongst the academic community in the humanities of what is required to build a new kind of publishing model.
Open Access Publishing Practices in a Complex Environment: Conditions, Barriers, and Bases of Power
The system of scholarly communication is a complex environment made up of various stakeholders including not only researchers, librarians, and publishers, but also academic administrators. This paper
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics
TLDR
Despite a total number of journals and publishing volumes comparable to respectable open access journals, the problem of predatory open access seems highly contained to just a few countries, where the academic evaluation practices strongly favor international publication, but without further quality checks.
Facing Plan S, publishers may set papers free.
TLDR
Publishers of subscription journals are considering an approach they hope will both comply with the plan and maintain their subscription income: allowing authors to post manuscripts in public archives as soon as their papers are published.
Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing
  • Philip M. Davis
  • Medicine
    FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology
  • 2011
TLDR
A randomized controlled trial of open access publishing, involving 36 participating journals in the sciences, social sciences, and humanities, reports on the effects of free access on article downloads and citations.
The world debates open-access mandates.
TLDR
Which countries9 funders are likely to join and which aren't, and whether Plan S is poised to shake up scientific publishing or remain a project that applies to only a small fraction of the world9s scientific papers.
...
...