The CAD triad hypothesis: a mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity).

@article{Rozin1999TheCT,
  title={The CAD triad hypothesis: a mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity).},
  author={Paul Rozin and L Lowery and Sumio Imada and Jonathan Haidt},
  journal={Journal of personality and social psychology},
  year={1999},
  volume={76 4},
  pages={
          574-86
        }
}
It is proposed that 3 emotions--contempt, anger, and disgust--are typically elicited, across cultures, by violations of 3 moral codes proposed by R. A. Shweder and his colleagues (R. A. Shweder, N. C. Much, M. Mahapatra, & L. Park, 1997). The proposed alignment links anger to autonomy (individual rights violations), contempt to community (violation of communal codes including hierarchy), and disgust to divinity (violations of purity-sanctity). This is the CAD triad hypothesis. Students in the… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

The moral emotions: a social-functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt.
TLDR
Support is found for the prediction that anger, disgust, and contempt should be differentiable both in antecedent appraisals and in consequent actions and judgments, and for evidence that these emotions are associated with different consequences.
Trait Contempt and the Five Moral Foundations
Rozin and colleagues’ CAD model (1999) proposed that violations of three different moral domains (community, autonomy, and divinity) each elicit a specific emotional response (contempt, anger, and
Judging Fatness: The Effects of Emotion on Moral Judgment and Moral Judgment on Emotion
Research regarding the CAD Triad Hypothesis shows that three specific emotions (contempt, anger, and disgust) are associated with three matched types of moral transgressions (community, autonomy, and
On the emotions associated with violations of three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity)
According to CAD theory, different moral domains are associated with different emotions: (C) community violations with contempt, (A) autonomy violations with anger, and (D) divinity violations with
CAD Revisited
The CAD model posits a mapping of contempt, anger, and disgust onto the moral codes of community, autonomy, and divinity, respectively. A recent study by Hutcherson and Gross posited moral disgust as
Do community and autonomy moral violations elicit different emotions?
TLDR
Community and autonomy violations did not differ significantly in the emotion elicited: overall, both types of violations elicited more anger than contempt (and more negative emotion of any kind than positive emotion).
Deservingness and emotions: Testing a structural model that relates discrete emotions to the perceived deservingness of positive or negative outcomes
A study is described that tested a model (Feather in Eur Rev Soc Psychol 17:38–73, 2006) relating emotions to the appraisal of outcome deservingness for self or other person. Outcome deservingness
The role of emotions in moral judgments
This study investigated whether the emotions contempt, anger, and disgust were specifically related to a moral judgment in the category community, autonomy, and divinity respectively according to the
An Attributional Analysis of Moral Emotions: Naïve Scientists and Everyday Judges
This article provides an analysis of moral emotions from an attributional point of view, guided by the metaphors of man as a naïve scientist (Heider, 1958) and as a moral judge (Weiner, 2006). The
Folk beliefs about the relationships anger and disgust have with moral disapproval
TLDR
While anger is understood to be strongly related to moral disapproval of people’s actions and character, disgust is not, and in contexts where disgust expressions are thought to coincide somewhat with moral disapproval, part of the reason is that the expression is perceived as anger.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 53 REFERENCES
Body, Psyche, and Culture: The Relationship between Disgust and Morality
"Core disgust" is a food related emotion that is rooted in evolution but is also a cultural product. Seven categories of disgust elicitors have been observed in an American sample. These include
Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?
TLDR
For Brazilian and U.S. adults and children of high and low socioeconomic status, moral judgments were better predicted by affective reactions than by appraisals of harmfulness and suggestions are made for building cross-culturally valid models of moral judgment.
Signs of appeasement: evidence for the distinct displays of embarrassment, amusement, and shame
According to appeasement hypotheses, embarrassment should have a distinct nonverbal display that is more readily perceived when displayed by individuals from lower status groups. The evidence from 5
Varieties of disgust faces and the structure of disgust.
TLDR
The results support a theory of disgust that posits its origin as a response to bad tastes and maps its evolution onto a moral emotion.
Handbook of Emotions
Part 1. Interdisciplinary Foundations. R.C. Solomon, The Philosophy of Emotions. P.N. Stearns, History of Emotions: Issues of Change and Impact. J.E. Stets, J.H. Turner, The Sociology of Emotions. J.
Culture and moral development.
This essay reports the results of a cross-cultural development study of ideas about the moral (its form) and ideas about what is moral (its content). The informants for the study are children, five
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
People in different cultures have strikingly different construals of the self, of others, and of the interdependence of the 2. These construals can influence, and in many cases determine, the very
Conceptual and methodological issues in the judgment of facial expressions of emotion
In two studies, subjects judged a set of facial expressions of emotion by either providing labels of their own choice to describe the stimuli (free-choice condition), choosing a label from a list of
A perspective on disgust.
TLDR
The ontogeny of disgust, which the author believes develops during the first 8 years of life, is considered and the idea that feces, the universal disgust object, is also the first is explored, and the mechanisms for the acquisition of disgust are examined.
The Future of Moral Psychology: Truth, Intuition, and the Pluralist Way
Donagan. A. (l977). The theory of morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Hampshire. S. (1983). Moralit)' and conflict. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press. Hartshorne. H., & May. M.
...
...