The Brainstorming Myth

@article{Furnham2000TheBM,
  title={The Brainstorming Myth},
  author={Adrian Furnham},
  journal={Business Strategy Review},
  year={2000},
  volume={11},
  pages={21-28}
}
  • A. Furnham
  • Published 1 December 2000
  • Psychology
  • Business Strategy Review
Research shows unequivocally that brainstorming groups produce fewer and poorer quality ideas than the same number of individuals working alone. Yet firms continue to use brainstorming as a technique for generating ideas. This continuing use of an ineffective technique is interesting psychologically. From a practical viewpoint, understanding why brainstorming is usually ineffective, and why people still do it, gives a basis for suggesting how managers can improve the way they use it. 

Tables from this paper

Individual and Group Electronic Brainstorming in an Industrial Setting
TLDR
An experiment was conducted comparing the effectiveness of individual versus group electronic brainstorming in addressing real-world “wickedly difficult” challenges and demonstrated that individuals performed at least as well as groups in terms of number of ideas produced and significantly outperformed groups in Terms of the quality of those ideas.
How to make brainstorming and idea screening learning more effective
TLDR
This study combines guidelines how experimental brainstorming learning setting should be applied and could be varied while noting the known pitfalls of brainstorming and student assessment and verified that idea quantity is helping only on the later stages of idea screening.
Effects of Task Instructions and Brief Breaks on Brainstorming
Experiment 1 examined the effects of additional brainstorming rules for groups and looked at whether the presence of a facilitator who actively enforced the rules of brainstorming was beneficial.
Beyond Idea Generation: The Power of Groups in Developing Ideas
Brainstorming research has claimed that individuals are more creative than groups. However, these conclusions are largely based on measuring creativity by the number of ideas generated, and
Assessing the Effectiveness of Electronic Brainstorming in an Industrial Setting: Experimental Design Document
An experiment is proposed which will compare the effectiveness of individual versus group brainstorming in addressing difficult, real world challenges. Previous research into electronic brainstorming
STIMULATED IDEATION SESSIONS IN PRODUCT PLANNING: ASSESSING QUANTITATIVE RESULTS OF INDIVIDUALS AND GROUPS
The paper presents an extensive testing campaign aimed at revealing the factors that mostly influence ideation performance within the Product Planning phase of engineering design. Tailored techniques
Integrating CTLs Into Campus Strategic Planning Through an Effective Brainstorming Process
One way Centers for Teaching and Learning (CTLs) can position themselves at the epicenter of campus activity and insert themselves into strategic planning is by transforming group work through an
Chapter 3 – Ideation
Improving Extreme-Scale Problem Solving: Assessing Electronic Brainstorming Effectiveness in an Industrial Setting
TLDR
The data indicate that work-relevant challenges are better solved by aggregating electronic individual responses rather than by electronically convening a group, and large nominal groups may be more appropriate corporate problem-solving vehicles.
Improving human effectiveness for extreme-scale problem solving : final report (assessing the effectiveness of electronic brainstorming in an industrial setting).
An experiment was conducted comparing the effectiveness of individual versus group electronic brainstorming in order to address difficult, real world challenges. While industrial reliance on
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-9 OF 9 REFERENCES
Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one.
Research has consistently found nominal group brainstorming (in which members work separately without communicating) to be superior to brainstorming in which group members interact verbally. This
Social influence processes in group brainstorming.
A series of studies examined the role of social influence processes in group brainstorming. Two studies with pairs and 1 with groups of 4 revealed that the performance of participants in interactive
Personality differences and group versus individual brainstorming
Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle.
We conducted four experiments to investigate free riding, evaluation apprehension, and production blocking as explanations of the difference in brainstorming productivity typically observed between
Social Comparison and Goal Setting in Brainstorming Groups1
Two studies were conducted to examine the influence of individual and group goal setting on brainstorming performance. Results from the studies indicated that the individual goals of nominal
The Role of Social Anxiousness in Group Brainstorming
The authors predicted that individuals high in dispositional anxiousness would perform poorly when brainstorming in groups but not during solitary brainstorming. Experiment 1 demonstrated this result
Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration.
Social loafing is the tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working collectively than when working individually. A meta-analysis of 78 studies demonstrates that social loafing is robust
Social loafing on cognitive tasks: An examination of the “sucker effect”
This study addresses the causes and potential mediators of social loafing on tasks which require active cognitive effort. Contrary to previous research, social loafing did occur despite the use of a
A comparison of two group brainstorming procedures.