The Bias Paradox: Why it's Not Just for Feminists Anymore

@article{Heikes2004TheBP,
  title={The Bias Paradox: Why it's Not Just for Feminists Anymore},
  author={Deborah K. Heikes},
  journal={Synthese},
  year={2004},
  volume={138},
  pages={315-335}
}
The bias paradox emerges out of a tension between objectivism and relativism.If one rejects a certain the conception objectivity as absolute impartiality and value-neutrality (i.e., if all views are biased), how, then, can one hold that some epistemic perspectives are better than others? This is a problem that has been most explicitly dealt with in feminist epistemology, but it is not unique to feminist perspectives. In this paper, I wish to clearly lay out the nature of the paradox and the… 
View on Springer
wikidata.org
8 Citations
Highly Influential Citations
1
Background Citations
3

8 Citations

Citation Type

Citation Type

The Bias Paradox: Are Standpoint Epistemologies Self-contradictory?
Abstract Standpoint epistemologies are based on two central theses: the situated knowledge thesis and the thesis of epistemic privilege. The bias paradox suggests that there is a tension between…
Philosophical Foundations of Contemporary Intolerance: Why We No Longer Take Martin Luther King, Jr. Seriously
ABSTRACT A growing body of research suggests that political polarization in the United States is at a forty-year high, and that it is rooted less in disagreements over policy than in hostile…
Assessing information taxonomies using epistemology and the sociology of science
TLDR
A literature review to determine whether or not information taxonomy work, as a specific activity within the broader field of knowledge organisation system construction, can usefully be compared to a process of scientific enquiry concludes that the achievement of consensus within communities is similar.
Towards Accountability for Machine Learning Datasets: Practices from Software Engineering and Infrastructure
TLDR
A rigorous framework for dataset development transparency that supports decision-making and accountability is introduced, which uses the cyclical, infrastructural and engineering nature of dataset development to draw on best practices from the software development lifecycle.
Between Dogmatism and Speculation: A Critical Assessment of Qiraʾat Studies
  • S. Laher
  • Education
    مجلة كلية الشريعة و الدراسات الإسلامية
  • 2020
هذه المقالة عبارة عن تحليل نقدي للدراسات الغربية حول القراءات القرآنية، وكيفية مغايرتها دراسات علماء المسلمين، من منظور الموضوعية والانحياز. فبعد عرض موجز لأبرز الآراء الموجودة في الساحة، تم استخراج…
System-driven Research: Legitimate Experimental Design for Biological/biomedical Research
Scope and Methods of Political Science Political Science 790 Winter 2010
SOCIAL THEORY AS CARTESIAN SCIENCE: AN AUTO-CRITIQUE FROM A QUANTUM PERSPECTIVE

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 28 REFERENCES
Realism versus Relativism: Towards a Politically Adequate Epistemology
Within feminism, the argument between realism and relativism appears to be both acute and political. I shall examine this argument, primarily from a political point of view. My philosophical…
Feminist critiques of rationality: Critiques of science or philosophy of science?
Feminism and the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge
Feminist science studies and the sociology of scientific knowledge have emerged within the past twenty years as explicit challenges to the epistemological individualism that still predominates within…
Who Knows: From Quine to a Feminist Empiricism
Acknowledgments Introduction: Reopening a Discussion 1. Empiricism and Feminist Science Criticism 2. Autonomy, Objectivity, and Incommensurability 3. Quine: Science (Almost) without Boundaries 4.…
Knowledge and Power
‘What Do Bosses Do?’ (Marglin, 1974) theorized that the detailed division of labour characteristic of capitalist production owed more to the advantages of control which it afforded the capitalists…
Beyond objectivism and relativism
Modern science is inseparable from the society that supports it. Yet now more than ever before the scientist is encouraged to specialize and narrow his field of vision. Stewart Richards argues that…
A Discourse on Method
If this Discourse appear too long to be read at once, it may be divided into six Parts: and, in the first, will be found various considerations touching the Sciences; in the second, the principal…
Meditations on a First Philosophy
Several years have now elapsed since I first became aware that I had accepted, even from my youth, many false opinions for true, and that consequently what I afterward based on such principles was…
The a Priori Rules of Rationality
Both these ideas are intuitively plausible: rationality has an external aim, such as forming a true belief or good decision; and the rationality of a belief or decision is determined purely by facts…
Philosophy after Objectivity: Making Sense in Perspective
Introduction 1. Ontology, Evidence, and Philosophical Questions 2. Justification, Meta-Epistemology, and Meaning 3. Meaning, Interpretation, and Analyticity 4. Reasons, Truth, and Relativism 5.…
...
...