The Basic Slippery Slope Argument

@article{Walton2015TheBS,
  title={The Basic Slippery Slope Argument},
  author={Douglas Walton},
  journal={Informal Logic},
  year={2015},
  volume={35},
  pages={273-311}
}
  • D. Walton
  • Published 2 September 2015
  • Philosophy
  • Informal Logic
Although studies have yielded a detailed taxonomy of types of slippery slope arguments, they have failed to identify a basic argumentation scheme that applies to all. Therefore, there is no way of telling whether a given argument is a slippery slope argument or not. This paper solves the problem by providing a basic argumentation scheme. The scheme is shown to fit a clear and easily comprehensible example of a slippery slope argument that strongly appears to be reasonable, something that has… 

Figures from this paper

Uncertainty in Argumentation Schemes: Negative Consequences and Basic Slippery Slope
TLDR
It is argued that some modifications to the structure of these Argumentation Schemes or to their Critical Questions could facilitate the process of Knowledge Extraction and modeling from these two argumentative patterns.
Slipping on Slippery Slope Arguments
TLDR
This paper identifies several types of mechanisms leading to slippery slopes in real-life contexts to demonstrate that both the strength of SSAs and the justifiability of using SSAs are best assessed on a case-by-case basis.
Slippery slope arguments imply opposition to change
TLDR
Evidence is presented that SSAs are interpreted as a form of consequentialist argument, inviting inferences about the speaker's (or writer’s) attitudes, and that this degree of internal coherence influences the perceived strength and persuasiveness of the argument.
A Formalization of the Slippery Slope Argument
TLDR
It is pointed out that since whether an SSA is persuasive rests on whether its ultimate consequence is really unacceptable to the audience, value judgement should play an important role in the deliberation.
The Slippery Slope Argument in the Ethical Debate on Genetic Engineering of Humans
TLDR
It is shown that the slippery slope argument is basically a reasonable (but defeasible) form of argument, but is often flawed when used in ethical debates because of failures to meet the requirements of its scheme.
Slippery Slope Arguments in Legal Contexts: Towards Argumentative Patterns
Addressing the slippery slope argument (SSA) in legal contexts from the perspective of pragma-dialectics, this paper elaborates the conditions under which an SSA-scheme instance is used reasonably
Bright lines or blurred lines? Universal background checks and the NRA slippery slope argument
ABSTRACT This essay analyzes and evaluates the slippery slope argument (SSA) as presented by the National Rifle Association. The work of argument scholars and informal logicians, particularly of
Corpus Linguistics Methods in the Study of (Meta)Argumentation
As more and more sophisticated software is created to allow the mining of arguments from natural language texts, this paper sets out to examine the suitability of the well-established and readily
The Judicial Character of Late Liberal Prudence: Paul v. Davis
Abstract:A significant ideological shift has occurred in jurisprudential understanding of the social contract. Reading a landmark opinion from Justice Rehnquist—Paul v. Davis (1976)—as a pivot point
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 44 REFERENCES
What's Wrong with Slippery Slope Arguments?
  • T. Govier
  • Philosophy
    Canadian Journal of Philosophy
  • 1982
Slippery slope arguments are commonly thought to be fallacious. But is there a single fallacy which they all commit? A study of applied logic texts reveals competing diagnoses of the supposed error,
Slippery Slope Arguments
Introduction and perspectives The sorites slippery slope argument The causal slippery slope argument The precedent slippery slope argument The full slippery slope argument Analysis of the dialectical
The Argument of the Beard
The essence of the argument of the beard (so-called by some logic textbooks) is the tactic used by a respondent to reply to a proponent, "The criterion you used to define a key term in your argument
The psychological mechanism of the slippery slope argument
The great slippery-slope argument.
TLDR
Although there are slippery-slope arguments that are sound and convincing, typical formulations of the Nazi-invoking argument are found to be seriously deficient both in logical rigour and in the social history and psychology required as a scholarly underpinning.
Argumentation Schemes
TLDR
This book takes the reader from the elementary exposition in the first chapter to the current state of the art in the research efforts to formalize and classify the schemes, outlined in the last three chapters.
The Camel's Nose is in the Tent: Rules, Theories and Slippery Slopes
Slippery slopes have been the topic of a spate of recent literature. In this Article, the authors provide a general theory for understanding and evaluating slippery slope arguments (SSAs) and their
Human gene therapy: down the slippery slope?
TLDR
This argument will address human gene therapy in terms of each of the three versions of the slippery slope argument, partly relying on slippery slope arguments against this practice that have already surfaced in the literature.
Implicatures as Forms of Argument
In this paper, we use concepts, structure and tools from argumentation theory to show how conversational implicatures are triggered by conflicts of presumptions. Presumptive implicatures are shown to
An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments
  • H. Prakken
  • Philosophy, Computer Science
    Argument Comput.
  • 2010
An abstract framework for structured arguments is presented, which instantiates Dung's (‘On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming, and
...
...