The Barefoot Debate: Can Minimalist Shoes Reduce Running-Related Injuries?

@article{Rixe2012TheBD,
  title={The Barefoot Debate: Can Minimalist Shoes Reduce Running-Related Injuries?},
  author={Jeffrey A Rixe and Robert A. Gallo and Matthew L. Silvis},
  journal={Current Sports Medicine Reports},
  year={2012},
  volume={11},
  pages={160–165}
}
Abstract Running has evolved throughout history from a necessary form of locomotion to an athletic and recreational pursuit. During this transition, our barefoot ancestors developed footwear. By the late 1970s, running popularity surged, and footwear manufacturers developed the running shoe. Despite new shoe technology and expert advice, runners still face high injury rates, which have yet to decline. Recently, “minimalist” running, marked by a soft forefoot strike and shorter, quicker strides… 
Orthopaedic Perspective on Barefoot and Minimalist Running
TLDR
A lack of cushion and support promotes a forefoot or midfoot strike rather than a rearfoot strike, decreasing the impact transient and stress on the hip and knee.
The Effect Of Minimalistic Running On Running-Related Injuries In Habitually Shod Individuals: A Review
TLDR
Research indicates barefoot and minimalist footwear have effects on running form, peak impact force, and a number of common running injuries, and subsequently, these footwear styles may increase the risk of certain injuries.
Barefoot Versus Shoe Running: From the Past to the Present
  • Y. Kaplan
  • Medicine
    The Physician and sportsmedicine
  • 2014
TLDR
Although there is no evidence that confirms or refutes improved performance and reduced injuries in barefoot runners, it seems that barefoot running may be an acceptable training method for athletes and coaches, as it may minimize the risks of injury.
Barefoot Running: Between Fashion and Real Way to Prevent Joint Osteo Lesions?
TLDR
Great flexibility can be achieved by decreasing the flexion angle of the knee, which decreases the demand for quadriceps muscles and the risk of knee injury with a greater risk of injury at the tibial level.
The Biomechanical Differences Between Barefoot and Shod Distance Running: A Systematic Review and Preliminary Meta-Analysis
TLDR
Modified results indicate moderate evidence that barefoot running is associated with reduced peak ground reaction force (GRF), increased foot and ankle plantarflexion and increased knee flexion at ground contact compared with running in a neutral shoe, and clear guidance for clinical practice is limited because of the low methodological quality of the associated studies.
Gait Retraining with Foot Strike Patterns as Management for Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome: A Brief Review
TLDR
Because of the increased load at the ankle during forefoot striking, future research should address whether changing foot strike patterns negatively affects ankle function.
Conceptualizing minimalist footwear: an objective definition
TLDR
The aim of this review article is to provide a structural definition for minimalist footwear based on studies that have examined the influence of footwear on biomechanical variables during running.
Effect of Minimalist Footwear on Running Efficiency
TLDR
When compared with running in traditional, cushioned shoes, both barefoot (socked) running and minimalist running shoes produce greater running efficiency in some experienced runners, with a greater tendency toward a midfoot or forefoot strike and a shorter ground contact time.
Logical fallacies in the running shoe debate: let the evidence guide prescription
TLDR
There remains a lack of conclusive evidence to support traditional shoe prescription to prevent RRIs, and the more recent paradigms of maximalism, zero-drop shoes and choosing a shoe based on comfort appear to be gaining in popularity.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 42 REFERENCES
Running-related injury prevention through barefoot adaptations.
TLDR
It is hypothesized that the adaptations which produce shock absorption, an inherent consequence of barefoot activity and a mechanism responsible for the low injury frequency in unshod populations, are related to deflection of the medial longitudinal arch of the foot on loading.
Barefoot-simulating footwear associated with metatarsal stress injury in 2 runners.
TLDR
2 cases of metatarsal stress fracture in experienced runners whose only regimen change was the adoption of barefoot-simulating footwear are reported, alarming in that they occurred in experienced male runners without any other risk factors for stress injury to bone.
Biomechanical and physiological comparison of barefoot and two shod conditions in experienced barefoot runners.
TLDR
The data of this study support the assumption that changes in the foot-ground interface led to changes in running pattern in a group of experienced barefoot runners and the Fivefingers model seems to be effective in imitating the barefoot conditions while providing a small amount of protection.
Effect of footwear on high and low arched runners' mechanics during a prolonged run.
Stress fractures in runners.
TLDR
Although running is a common activity in this country, an apparent lack of recognition by primary care physicians exists concerning the frequency of stress fractures in runners, and this article is to alert the clinician to this condition and to describe its clinical and radiological features.
Mechanical comparison of barefoot and shod running.
TLDR
Barefoot running leads to a reduction of impact peak in order to reduce the high mechanical stress occurring during repetitive steps, and this neural-mechanical adaptation could also enhance the storage and restitution of elastic energy at ankle extensors level.
Prevention of Running Injuries
TLDR
Other potential injury variables are reviewed, including strength, biomechanics, stretching, warm-up, nutrition, psychological factors, and shoes, to determine whether interventions to address any of these will help prevent running injury.
The effects of habitual footwear use: foot shape and function in native barefoot walkers
TLDR
Assessment of morphological and functional effects of the habitual use of footwear in habitually barefoot walkers from India suggests that footwear that fails to respect natural foot shape and function will ultimately alter the morphology and the biomechanical behaviour of the foot.
Barefoot-shod running differences: shoe or mass effect?
TLDR
The mechanical modifications of running showed that the main role of the shoe was to attenuate the foot-ground impact by adding damping material which may lead to a decrease of the storage and restitution of elastic energy capacity which could explain the lower net efficiency reported in shod running.
Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners
TLDR
Kinematic and kinetic analyses show that even on hard surfaces, barefoot runners who fore-foot strike generate smaller collision forces than shod rear-foot strikers, and this difference results primarily from a more plantarflexed foot at landing and more ankle compliance during impact, decreasing the effective mass of the body that collides with the ground.
...
...