The Austrian Dehomogenization Debate, or the Possibility of a Hayekian Planner

@article{Agafonow2012TheAD,
  title={The Austrian Dehomogenization Debate, or the Possibility of a Hayekian Planner},
  author={Alejandro Agafonow},
  journal={Review of Political Economy},
  year={2012},
  volume={24},
  pages={273 - 287}
}
The aim of this paper is to explore the implications of the debate on the dehomogenization of Hayek and Mises. The Misesian thesis about the vulnerability of the Hayekian argument prevails, and that its implications have thus far not been fully appreciated. These implications consist, on the one hand, of the correct integration of the proto-Hayekian bases of economic calculation into labor time accounting socialism and, on the other, of the possibility of successfully integrating appraisement… 
2 Citations

Technical or political? The socialist economic calculation debate

The paper presents both the key arguments and the historical context of the socialist economic calculation debate. I argue that Oskar Lange presented the most developed strategy to deal with

W stronę demokracji ekonomicznej. Między socjalizmem rynkowym a demokratycznym planowaniem.

The main aim of this article was to answer the question of what planning model is applicable in postcapitalist, transitional period economy based on worker self-management. The works of authors

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 50 REFERENCES

Mises and hayek dehomogenized

n important contributing factor to the resurgence of Austrian economics in the 1970s was the appearance of a handful of articles which drew the attention of the economics profession to the

The hayek and mises controversy: Bridging differences

A lmost a decade ago Joseph Salerno, Murray Rothbard, and Jeffery Herberner (hereafter referred to as SRH) published a set of articles in Review of Austrian Economics aimed at drawing a distinction

Calculation, complexity and planning: the socialist calculation debate once again

This article offers a reassessment of the socialist calulation debate, and examines the extent to which the conclusions of that debate must be modified in the light of the subsequent development of

Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis

This is a newly annotated edition of the classic first published in German in 1922. It is the definitive refutation of nearly every type of socialism ever devised. Mises presents a wide-ranging

COMPUTADORES Y DEMOCRACIA ECONÓMICA

The collapse of previously existing socialism was due to causes embedded in its economic mechanism, which are not inherent in all possible socialisms. The article argues that Marxist economic theory,

On the Economic Theory of Socialism: Part Two

Socialists have certainly good reason to be grateful to Professor Mises, the great advocatus diaboli of their cause. For it was his powerful challenge that forced the socialists to recognise the

Human Action: A Treatise on Economics

  • L. Mises
  • Economics, Political Science
  • 1949
4 books in slipcase. Mises attributes the tremendous technological progress and the consequent increase in wealth and general welfare in the last two centuries to the introduction of liberal

The Microeconomic Efficiency Argument for Socialism Revisited

Contemporary writers of comparative economic systems textbooks are under an almost ritualistic obligation to "describe and analyze" the market socialist model of Oskar Lange. It is an obligation,

Two Pages of Fiction

Are the communist economies strong or weak? Russia bristles with arms and uses strong language. But is the socialist economy flawed at the center? Professor Hayek here argues, against the Polish

Socialism: A property or knowledge problem?

In a series of recent articles in The Review of Austrian Economics, Joseph Salerno began to de-homogenize the often conflated economic and social theories of Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich A. Hayek.