The Agenda-Setting Impact of Major Presidential TV Addresses

  title={The Agenda-Setting Impact of Major Presidential TV Addresses},
  author={Jeffrey S. Peake and Matthew Eshbaugh-Soha},
  journal={Political Communication},
  pages={113 - 137}
The ability to set the national agenda is an important power of the modern presidency. Policy-specific, nationally televised speeches provide presidents with the best rhetorical opportunity to set the national agenda; however, research on presidential agenda setting has not systematically explored their effects. Although the conventional understanding of presidential agenda setting suggests that presidents should be able to focus media attention through televised addresses, research paints a… 
Presidential Agenda-Setting of Traditional and Nontraditional News Media
The president’s ability to influence the news agenda is central to the study of American politics. Although there is a large literature that examines presidential agenda-setting vis-à-vis traditional
The Conditional Nature of Presidential Agenda Influence on TV News: The Case of Education
The president’s ability to influence media attention is crucial to theoretical understandings of institutional agenda setting. We add a key caveat: the conditional nature of how presidential
Assessing Presidential Agenda-Setting Capacity: Dynamic Comparisons of Presidential, Mass Media, and Public Attention to Economic Issues
Research on presidential agenda setting has rarely attempted to simultaneously assess the ability of the president to influence the policy agendas of the mass media and the public. This is primarily
Analyzing policy issues in presidential speeches and the media: An agenda-setting study
Analyzing Policy Issues in Presidential Speeches and the Media: An Agenda-Setting Study by Jessica L. Hughes Dr. Susanna Priest, Thesis Committee Chair Professor of Journalism University of Nevada,
Presidential Agenda-Setting on the Economy during the “Great Recession”
  • J. Peake
  • Economics, Political Science
  • 2017
Presidents are often identified as the most significant agenda-setter in the policy making process. However, agenda-setting theory indicates significant limitations to presidential leadership,
The Presidency and Local Media: Local Newspaper Coverage of President George W. Bush
Leading the media, public, and Congress through speeches is at the core of modern presidential governance. But just as the modern political environment requires presidents to appeal for support
Agenda Setting from the Oval Office: An Experimental Examination of Presidential Influence over the Public Agenda
This study employs an experimental approach to isolate and directly test the extent to which presidents can affect public perceptions of issue importance and support for policy action, taking into
Presidential Leadership of the Tone of News Coverage and Public Opinion on Iraq
Much research questions the president’s ability to lead public opinion. Yet most of this research does not directly assess how news coverage might influence presidential leadership of public opinion.
Measuring the Media Agenda
Measuring media attention to politically relevant topics is of interest to a broad array of political science and communications scholars. We provide a practical guide for the construction,
The President as Agenda Setter‐in‐Chief: The Dynamics of Congressional and Presidential Agenda Setting
In this paper, we investigate the agenda leadership capability of two American political institutions, Congress and the presidency, in an array of issue areas that include both domestic and foreign


Presidential Rhetoric and the Public Agenda
Theory: The theory of presidential influence over agenda setting is used to predict the impact of presidential rhetoric over the public's agenda. Hypotheses: The more attention presidents give to
Presidential Influence Over the Systemic Agenda
Using Vector Autoregression (VAR) analysis, it is demonstrated that presidents have some influence over the systemic agenda, at least in the short term, with policy type being an important predictor of presidential influence.
Who Influences Whom? The President, Congress, and the Media
Influencing the policy agenda has long been viewed as one of the most important sources of political power. For decades, scholars have maintained that the president has the most significant role in
Does it Matter What Presidents Say? The Influence of Presidential Rhetoric on the Public Agenda, 1946-2003
Although scholars have long recognized the president's pre-eminent status as an agenda-setter, there is surprisingly little evidence available to suggest that presidents can and do influence the
Presidents and the Economic Agenda
The president’s ability to influence the national policy agenda is an important component of presidential power. Although some maintain that presidents are favorably situated to set agendas, others
Presidential Agenda Setting in Foreign Policy
The traditional model of agenda setting places the Presidency as the primary agenda setter in American politics, particularly in foreign policy. Recent challenges to the traditional model argue that
Presidential Responsiveness and Public Policy-Making: The Publics and the Policies that Presidents Choose
We expect a president to respond to public opinion as an elected official in a democracy. Indeed, the president needs public support to overcome opposition to his policies in Congress and the
The Contemporary Presidency: “Going Local” to Reform Social Security
Leading the media, public, and Congress through speeches is at the core of presidential governance. But just as the modern political environment requires presidents to appeal for support through
Rethinking Presidential Responsiveness: The Public Presidency and Rhetorical Congruency, 1953–2001
Several studies have examined the relationship between presidential action and public opinion; however, few explore a direct and continuous connection between presidential rhetoric and public
Television News, Real-World Cues, and Changes in the Public Agenda
This paper examines the interrelationships between real-world cues, television news coverage, and public concern for the issues of energy, inflation, and unemployment. On the basis of longitudinal