The 9/11 Effect: Comparative Counter-Terrorism

  title={The 9/11 Effect: Comparative Counter-Terrorism},
  author={Kent Roach},
1. Introduction 2. The United Nations responds 3. Countries that did not immediately respond 4. The United States responds: executive power and extra-legalism 5. The United Kingdom responds: a legislative war on terrorism 6. Australia responds: hyper legislation 7. Canada responds: immigration, inquiries and human security 8. Conclusions. 
Introduction: Terrorism and Warfare—Extreme Conditions or the New Normal?
  • Myriam Feinberg
  • Political Science
  • Constitutionalism Under Extreme Conditions
  • 2020
Terrorism and warfare both represent violent extreme conditions par excellence and which often lead to an expressed need for a special reaction. On the other hand, terrorism seems to have become theExpand
Perceptions of terrorism in Australia: 1978–2019
ABSTRACT How and why have Australians come to view some infringement of their civil liberties as an acceptable trade-off in the interest of countering terrorism? This article contributes toExpand
Australia’s Counter-Terrorism Policies Since September 11, 2001: Harmonising National Security, Independent Oversight and Individual Liberties
Abstract Australia has remained insulated from mega terrorist attacks, but post-September 11 its involvement in the war on terror in Afghanistan, Iraq and against the Islamic State in Iraq and SyriaExpand
Anti-Terrorism Laws in the Maghreb Countries: The Mirror of a Democratic Transition that Never Was
This article sheds light on the counter-terrorism measures enacted by the Maghreb countries, with a comparative approach of the laws in Algeria, Mauritania, Morocco, and Tunisia. Carried out byExpand
The Continued Exceptionalism of the American Response to Daesh
This paper will discuss the American response to Daesh in relation to those of a number of other countries including France and Canada as well as supranational institutions including the UN SecurityExpand
Hijacking Counterterrorism: The Rise of National Anti-Terrorism Laws After 9/11
Author(s): Cody, Stephen Smith | Advisor(s): Fourcade, Marion | Abstract: In less than a decade 142 countries enacted or reformed more than 260 counterterrorism laws worldwide. The new laws, viewedExpand
Counterterrorism on Campus
Abstract:The threat of terrorism and risks of radicalization pervade modern life. Universities are no exception, especially as young people are vulnerable to recruitment by extremist groups.Expand
Striking the balance between conforming to human rights standards and enacting anti-terrorism legislation : a challenge of the 21st century : an Ethiopian perspective
The attacks against the United States of America (US) on 11 September 2001 paved the way for the coming into effect of much counter-terrorism legislation across the world. Ethiopia is one of theExpand
‘Let the Punishment Match the Offence’: Determining Sentences for Australian Terrorists
To date, 38 men have been charged with terrorism offences in Australia. Twenty-six have been convicted. The article commences with an overview of the factual circumstances leading to theseExpand
Australian National Security Intelligence Collection Since 9/11: Policy and Legislative Challenges
A key lesson from 9/11 was that intelligence agencies could no longer simply wait for information to arrive. The enhanced threat from Al Qaeda and their global franchises required an extensive andExpand


Terror in the Balance: Security, Liberty, and the Courts
Introduction PART I: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND THEORY 1. Emergencies, Tradeoffs, and Deference 2. The Panic Theory 3. The Democratic Failure Theory 4. The Ratchet Theory and Other Long-Run Effects PARTExpand
Sources and Trends in Post 9/11 Anti-Terrorism Laws
This paper examines UN Security Council Resolutions 1373 and 1624 and the Terrorism Act 2000 as three influential sources that have encouraged states to enact laws against the financing of terrorism,Expand
The Prevention of Terrorism in British Law
Theory of terrorism and anti-terrorism terrorism in Britain the Prevention of Terrorism Acts - history and structure proscribed organizations exclusion orders special offences powers of arrest andExpand
Terrorism and Legal Change: An International Law Lesson
This paper examines developments in international law since September 11. It reveals that Bill C-36 may be but one facet of a larger pattern of emergency-driven lawmaking with uncertain consequences.Expand
Nuclear Terrorism: The Ultimate Preventable Catastrophe
A call to action on the threat of nuclear terrorism predicts that a catastrophic attack is likely to occur within the next decade if policy makers continue present tactics, and states that such anExpand
Anti-Terrorism and Criminal Enforcement
Preface. Abbreviations. Table of cases. Shareholders' agreements and articles of association. Minority protection. Venture capital: the investment agreement. Joint ventures and the partnershipExpand
The War on Terrorism and the Rule of Law
1. Homeland Security: Must We Trade Civil Liberties for National Security? 2. Surveillance and the Patriot Act: Should There Be a 'Wall' Between Intelligence and Criminal Justice? 3. Data Mining:Expand
Legislating the War on Terror: An Agenda for Reform
The events of September 11 and subsequent American actions irrevocably changed the political, military, and legal landscapes of U.S. national security. Predictably, many of the changes wereExpand
Australian identity, interventionism and the War on Terror
1. Introduction Asaf Siniver 2. Security and 'terror' in the Middle East and North Africa: Drivers and limitations of Protest and 'terrorism' Gerd Nonneman 3. Radicalism, Extremism and Government inExpand
The Post-9/11 Migration of Britain's Terrorism Act 2000
The terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 have resulted in the expansion of anti-terrorism laws throughout the globe. The international and domestic reaction to these attacks constitute a type ofExpand