The 2003 Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy: Against all Odds or Rational Explanations?

@article{Nedergaard2006The2R,
  title={The 2003 Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy: Against all Odds or Rational Explanations?},
  author={Peter Nedergaard},
  journal={Journal of European Integration},
  year={2006},
  volume={28},
  pages={203 - 223}
}
  • P. Nedergaard
  • Published 1 July 2006
  • Political Science
  • Journal of European Integration
Abstract This article analyses the 2003 reform of the EU Common Agricultural Policy. On the basis of rational choice theory, it addresses to two basic questions: first, which processes led to the 2003 CAP reform? And second, how can the actual content of the reform — with, for example, increased bureaucratisation and more diffuse implementation — be accounted for? The article concludes that it is possible to rationally answer the two questions and that the external pressure resulting from the… 
The Logic of Policy Development: Lessons Learned from Reform and Routine within the CAP 1980–2003
Abstract With the point of departure in the otherwise extensive knowledge on reform and routine within the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of the European Union (EU), this paper argues that: (1) in
The Logic of Policy Development: Lessons Learned
With the point of departure in the otherwise extensive knowledge on reform and routine within the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of the European Union (EU), this paper argues that: (1) in order to
The reform of the 2003 Common Agricultural Policy: an advocacy coalition explanation1
This article addresses the core research question – how can we understand the policy processes leading to the 2003 Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reform? It utilizes the Advocacy Coalition
Business and politics in the European Union. ON the analysis of the economic-political integration in Europe
The article discusses relevant theories concerning economic political integration within the political system of the European Union which today is far the most important regulatory framework for
Can Historical Institutionalism Explain the Reforms of the Common Agricultural Policy?
Historical institutionalism, one of the three variants of new institutionalism, has been largely employed by scholars to explain the development of one of the first policies developed at the European
The Common Agricultural Policy Health Check: time to check the health of the theory of the reform?
In 2008, the ministers of agriculture of European Union member states made a political agreement on the Common Agricultural Policy reform, also known as the Health Check. The reform coincided with
New Wine in Old Bottles : Critical Discourse Analysis of the Current Common EU Agricultural Policy Reform Agenda
A critical discourse analysis of two EU agricultural commissioners' speeches in the period 2000–2006 was carried out and substantiated by rational choice theory. The analysis reveals how the latest
Responding to Non‐Linear Internationalisation of Public Policy: The World Trade Organization and Reform of the Cap 1992–2013
The transfer of regulatory authority to international organisations can initiate domestic policy reform. The internationalisation process can be a one-off transfer of authority to international
Curbing Agricultural Exceptionalism: The EU's Response to External Challenge
From the launch of GATT in 1948, through to the Uruguay Round of GATT negotiations, the niceties of international trade rules had little impact on the design and implementation of EU farm policies.
Existing Approaches Towards Explaining and Understanding CAP Reforms
This chapter presents the existing approaches towards explaining and understanding CAP reforms. Firstly, rational and public choice theories based explanations of CAP as an agricultural supports
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 43 REFERENCES
Agricultural Policy Reform: Politics and Process in the EU and US in the 1990s
The analytical framework for farm policy reform the search for an agricultural policy paradigm shift. Reform frustrated: the Uruguay round, 1986-1990 the 1990 US farm bill - reducing the budget, but
Market Failures and Government Failures: A Theoretical Model of the Common Agricultural Policy
Economic theory has tried to explain the characteristics of the Common Agricultural Policy inductively on the basis of certain economic peculiarities of agriculture. However, by overlooking the
Economics of the Common Agricultural Policy
The 2003 reform of the Common Agricultural Policy has been assessed as an important reform in the right direction with respect to allocational efficiency and regarding environmental, animal welfare
The 1992 CAP Reform, the Uruguay Round and the Commission: Conceptualizing Linked Policy Games
Over the past decade, most OECD countries have begun to reform fundamentally their agricultural policies. Some dispute has emerged over the extent to which policy-making at the international level
Agricultural policy reform in the European Community: a three-level game analysis
Since the beginning of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) Uruguay Round the European Community (EC) has twice attempted to reform the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), resulting in the
Reforming the CAP: Policy Networks and Broader Institutional Structures
The article develops an analytical framework to analyse how policy networks and the broader institutional context in which they are embedded influence reform outcomes. The framework is applied in a
Agricultural Policy Reform and the Uruguay Round: Synergistic Linkage in a Two-Level Game?
Domestic agricultural subsidy policies in the United States and in the European Union (EU) underwent substantial liberal reforms between 1990 and 1996. In the United States in 1990, Congress reduced
Agricultural Power in the European Community: Explaining the Fate of CAP and GATT Negotiations
For more than two decades the European Community's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has been widely criticized for excessively burdening consumers and taxpayers, stimulating surplus production, and
Out of the shadows: The general secretariat of the Council of Ministers
Influence does not equal formal powers. The European Union is rich in examples of institutions which, in the absence of formal powers, nevertheless manage to bring significant influence to bear on
Public Choice III
This book represents a considerable revision and expansion of Public Choice II (1989). Six new chapters have been added, and several chapters from the previous edition have been extensively revised.
...
...